Background: Annexin A5 is thought to have a role in the pathophysiology of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS)-a syndrome characterised by recurrent thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity. Objective: To investigate whether anti-annexin A5 immunoglobulin (Ig)M or IgG antibodies, or the 21CRT polymorphism of annexin A5, is a risk factor for thrombosis or miscarriage, and whether the 21CRT polymorphism is correlated with APS. Methods: A cohort study was carried out with a population of 198 patients with primary APS, systemic lupus erythematosus or lupus-like disease. For the detection of anti-annexin A5 antibodies and the measurement of annexin A5 plasma levels, ELISA-type methods were used. The annexin A5 21CRT mutation was detected by restriction fragment length polymorphism. Results: 71 patients were positive for annexin A5 IgM or IgG antibodies, of whom 53 patients were positive for anti-annexin A5 IgG antibodies and 27 of 198 patients were positive for anti-annexin A5 IgM antibodies. The prevalence of IgM or IgG anti-annexin A5 antibodies was not significantly associated with thrombosis or miscarriage on multivariate analysis. The prevalence of the 21CRT mutation in the annexin A5 gene (46/198 patients) was significantly associated with miscarriage (odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 6.7, independent risk factor). Conclusion: The detection of anti-annexin A5 antibodies does not seem relevant for estimating the risk for thrombosis or miscarriage in APS. The 21CRT mutation was an independent risk factor for miscarriage, which is independent of APS.

No abstract

Phenotypic analysis showed that all laboratory parameters are lower in genetically confirmed VWD 2N patients compared with heterozygous 2N carriers. The clinical phenotype in genetically confirmed VWD 2N patients is comparable to mild haemophilia A patients and more severe than heterozygous 2N carriers.

No abstract

SummaryThe development of neutralising antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) is a major complication of haemophilia A (HA) therapy. We aimed to construct an individual risk profile for the development of inhibitors in HA and started by screening for the causative mutation in our HA patient population. A total of 109 patients and 28 carriers were screened. The analysis revealed 38 different mutations in the FVIII gene, of which 13 have not been described on the Haemophilia A Mutation, Search, Test and Resource Site (HAMSTeRS). Twenty-five mutations have been reported previously and all except two had a similar phenotype to what has been described. Three novel mutations were associated with severe HA: one non-missense mutation, a small insertion in the A2 domain, and two missense mutations, a H256R mutation in the A1 domain and a L2025P substitution in the C1 domain. One novel mutation, Y156C, was associated with moderate HA. Nine novel mutations caused mild HA. The P130R, D167E and V278M mutations are located in the A1 domain. R439C, Y511H, A544G and Q645H in the A2 domain, L1758F in the A3 domain and a S2157R mutation in the C1 domain. In conclusion, the genotypic profile of our HA population was not different from others described and is suitable to study inhibitor formation.