<p align="center"><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p><p>The enactment of Law no. 46 Year 2009 about corruption court, is authorized to examine and decide the crime of corruption cases proposedby KPK or Prosecutor (State and High). Based on Article 35 paragraph (1) jo paragraph (4) of Law Number 46 of 2009, confirmed that corruption courts (TIPIKOR courts) are only located in each provincial capital whose jurisdiction covers the province concerned. By this provision, the Prosecutor Office in each district/city must transfer the corruption cases to the Corruption Court in the provincial capital. There are the problems as the following: first one, Is the process of criminal justice in the archipelago province like NTT able to fulfill the judicial principle of quick, low cost and simple?; second one, Is this condition not an obstacle in the process of criminal law enforcement in NTT?; The result of this research is that the Corruption Court in Kupang, conducted by several Prosecutor Offices, the samples do not meet the judicial principles of quick, low costs and simple. The obstacles besides spending much expenses, there are other factors such as weather, intentionally neglect the obligation as the experts, witnesses due to long time and high expenses.  Law enforcement becomes less maximal due to the existing budget, and it can only be done by a minimal law enforcement process with a fairly expensive cost.                                   </p><p><strong><em>Keyword (Keywords): Trial, </em><em>Criminal Court</em><em>,</em><em> TIPIKOR,</em><em> Archipelago, Expenses incurred.</em></strong></p>

No abstract

Based on Law no. 46 of 2009 on the Court of Corruption, this court has the authority to examine and decide on corruption cases filed by the KPK and the State Prosecutors and High Offices. According to Article 35 paragraph (1) to paragraph (4) of Law no. 46 year 2009 TIPIKOR courts exist only in each provincial capital whose jurisdiction covers the province concerned. The existence of this provision would not want the District Attorney in every district/city should delegate the case to the Corruption Court in the provincial capital. Whereas the area of NTT is an archipelago area where distance between districts with the city of Kupang is very far. Based on the results research: the cost required by several State Prosecutors’ samples to prosecute 1 (one) case in TIPIKOR Court in Kupang is quite varied, i.e. Rp.127.534.000, -, Rp. 294,096,000, -, Rp. 376,556,000, and Rp. 354,220,000, -. The costs generally have exceeded the cost limit for the determined prosecution of Rp. 190,000,000, -. The variation of cost incurred by each State Prosecutor’s sample gives an illustration that the more distance from Kupang city, the greater the cost. In addition, the duration of the ongoing trial process has had an effect on the cost. Weather factors, flight delays due to bad weather make the trial schedule chaotic, and costs incurred increases. As a result, the work of witnesses becomes neglected, the Public Prosecutor’s job of handling other cases becomes impeded. Based on the matters above, it is necessary to create a sub-district court model and/or IT-based TIPIKOR judiciary to save relatively expensive cost and cut the time available to bring it closer to the quick, cheap, and simple justice principles. This alternative judicial model of TIPIKOR in addition to contributing to the theoretical level of future development of the judicial system, is expected to become a model for the mining of the judicial system in other islands provinces in Indonesia.

<p><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji tindak pidana pencemaran nama baik pada pasal 27 ayat (3) Undang-Undang No. 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dan mengidentifikasi pertimbangan hukum yang dilakukan dari berbagai kasus-kasus pencemaran nama baik. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif metode penelitian normatif dengan sumber hukum terdiri dari bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan diperoleh bahwa penafsiran norma hukum pada pasal 27 ayat (3) Undang-Undang No. 19 Tahun 2016 Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik harus ditafsirkan dengan norma hukum pada pasal 310 dan 311 KUHP sesuai dengan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 50/PUU-VI/2008. Pemberatan sanksi pidana pada pasal 45 ayat (1) lebih berat dari pasal 310 KUHP adalah wajar karena distribusi dan penyebaran informasi melalui media elektronik relatif lebih cepat, berjangkauan luas, dan memiliki dampak yang masif. Pertimbangan hakim pada kasus-kasus pencemaran nama baik pada pasal 27 ayat (3) telah menafsirkan dengan pasal 310 dan 311 KUHP, walaupun masih terdapat kekhilafan hakim dalam pertimbangan hukumnya.</p><p>Kata Kunci: Pencemaran Nama Baik, Tindak Pidana, KUHP</p><p> </p><p><strong><em>ABSTRACT</em></strong></p><p><em>This legal writing aims to examine the criminal act of defamation in Article 27 paragraph (3) of Law no. 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions and identify legal considerations made from various defamation cases. This research is a type of normative legal research that is prescriptive in a normative research method with legal sources consisting of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. Based on the research conducted, it was found that the interpretation of legal norms in Article 27 paragraph (3) of Law No. 19 of 2016 Amendments to Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions must be interpreted in accordance with the legal norms in articles 310 and 311 of the Criminal Code in accordance with the decision of the Constitutional Court no. 50/PUU-VI/2008. The weighting of criminal sanctions in Article 45 paragraph (1) which is heavier than Article 310 of the Criminal Code is reasonable because the distribution and dissemination of information through electronic media is relatively faster, has a wide reach, and has a massive impact. Judges' considerations in defamation cases in Article 27 paragraph (3) have interpreted them with Articles 310 and 311 of the Criminal Code, although there are still judges' mistakes in their legal considerations </em></p><p><em>Keywords: Defamation, Criminal Act, Criminal Code</em></p>

<p><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat ini adalah mensosialisasikan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika kepada para guru dan siswa di SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Karanganyar. Kegiatan ini bertujuan untuk mencegah para siswa melakukan penyalahgunaan narkotika. Maraknya penyalahgunaan narkotika di kalangan para generasi muda termasuk para siswa sekolah, baik sebagai pengguna maupun sebagai pengedar. Oleh karena itu, untuk mencegah semakin banyaknya pengguna narkoba di kalangan pelajar, maka perlu dilakukan sosialisasi bahaya penyalahgunaan narkotika. Metode kegiatan pengabdian ini berbentuk penyuluhan hukum Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika, yang dilanjutkan dengan dialog interaktif seputar narkoba antara para siswa dengan tim penyuluh hukum yakni para Dosen Bagian Pidana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret. Narkoba dari segi agama sudah pasti adalah sesuatu yang haram, dan dari segi masa depan sebuah bangsa, narkoba adalah senjata paling ampuh untuk menghancurkan sebuah negara. Diharapkan dengan adanya kegiatan penyuluhan hukum ini, semakin banyak pelajar yang memiliki wawasan tentang bahaya narkoba.</p><p><strong>Kata kunci : </strong>Undang-Undang Narkotika, narkoba, pelajar, penyuluhan hukum</p><p><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>This community service activity is to socialize Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics to teachers and students at SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Karanganyar. This activity aims to prevent students from abusing narcotics. The rise of narcotics abuse among the younger generation, including school students, both as users and as dealers. Therefore, to prevent the increasing number of drug users among students, it is necessary to socialize the dangers of narcotics abuse. The method of this service activity is in the form of legal counseling on Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, which is followed by an interactive dialogue about drugs between students and the legal advisory team, namely the Lecturers of the Criminal Section of the Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University. Drugs in terms of religion are definitely something that is forbidden, and in terms of the future of a nation, drugs are the most powerful weapon to destroy a country. It is hoped that with this legal counseling activity, more students will have insight into the dangers of drugs.</em></p><p><em>Keywords: </em><em>Narcotics Law, drugs, students, legal counseling</em></p>