We present a fast but reliable way to detect routing criticalities in VLSI chips. In addition, we show how this congestion estimation can be incorporated into a partitioning based placement algorithm. Different to previous approaches, we do not rerun parts of the placement algorithm or apply a post-placement optimization, but we use our congestion estimator for a dynamic avoidance of routability problems in one single run of the placement algorithm. Computational experiments on chips with up to 1,300,000 cells are presented: The framework reduces the usage of the most critical routing edges by 9.0% on average, the running time increase for the placement is about 8.7%. However, due to the smaller congestion, the running time of routing tools can be decreased drastically, so the total time for placement and (global) routing is decreased by 47% on average.

We present a fast but reliable way to detect routing criticalities in VLSI chips. In addition, we show how this congestion estimation can be incorporated into a partitioning based placement algorithm. Different to previous approaches, we do not rerun parts of the placement algorithm or apply a post-placement optimization, but we use our congestion estimator for a dynamic avoidance of routability problems in one single run of the placement algorithm. Computational experiments on chips with up to 1,300,000 cells are presented: The framework reduces the usage of the most critical routing edges by 9.0% on average, the running time increase for the placement is about 8.7%. However, due to the smaller congestion, the running time of routing tools can be decreased drastically, so the total time for placement and (global) routing is decreased by 47% on average.

We present BonnPlace, a new VLSI placement algorithm that combines the advantages of analytical and partitioning-based placers. Based on (non-disjoint) placements minimizing the total quadratic netlength, we partition the chip area into regions and assign the circuits to them (meeting capacity constraints) such that the placement is changed as little as possible. The core routine of our placer is a new algorithm for the Transportation Problem that allows to compute efficiently the circuit assignments to the regions. We test our algorithm on a set of industrial designs with up to 3.6 millions of movable objects and two sets of artificial benchmarks showing that it produces excellent results. In terms of wirelength, we can improve the results of leading-edge placement tools by about 5 %.

No abstract

VLSI placement tools usually work in two steps: First, the cells that have to be placed are roughly spread out over the chip area ignoring disjointness (global placement). Then, in a second step, the cells are moved to their final position such that all overlaps are removed and all additional constraints are met (detailed placement or legalization).We consider algorithms for legalization. In particular, we analyze a generic legalization algorithm based on minimum cost flows and dynamic programming. Specializations are being used in industry for many years, and an improved version was proposed very recently in [2]. The objective of all these algorithms is to minimize the weighted sum of (squared) movements, i.e. they assume the placement to be already optimized except for not being legal.To evaluate results, we propose two different lower bounds for the legalization problem, one based on linear assignment, and the other one based on an integer linear programming relaxation. We prove that the second lower bound is always at least as good as the first one. We also show how to compute the bounds efficiently. We then give an extensive experimental analysis of the algorithms and the lower bounds by testing them on a set of recent industrial ASICs with up to 2.4 million cells. In particular, we show that the gap between the new algorithm and the better lower bound is usually less than 10 percent. This proves that the legalization problem is solved almost optimally.Besides (weighted) total (squared) movement, we also consider various other objectives like wirelength, timing, and routability. Our experiments demonstrate that minimizing total (weighted, squared) movement has almost no negative effect on the timing properties, routability and netlength. Therefore the new algorithm will help in overall design closure.