No abstract

The paper argues the ideas developing the provisions of behavioral economics as a branch of economic theory. The authors substantiate a new method of studying the economic space, called 'the dialogue between the individual and the environment', characterize the causes of deformation in the development of economic relations, taking into account the features of economic space as a certain dynamic structure with peculiar topological properties. The research is focused on the task of identifying the main characteristics of economic space and pointing out those responsible for the development of socially inefficient institutions. The authors develop the concepts of balance and stability as applied to economic space, and work out the spatial approach to the study of economic relations. It is argued that the use of topological model makes it possible to set mathematically correct tasks of dealing with institutional crises as perturbations of the economic space. It is proved by the example of one of the types of organizational cultures, that the method proposed by the authors allows moving from the descriptive character of models to the content one. The proposed approach lets carry out a synthesis of theory and practice and thereby answer the question-why economics and practice are always there, but not together.

The necessity of developing a mathematical model of the calculation and theoretical forecasting of the resource of the working body of the tillage aggregate is substantiated. The formula as a mathematical model is proposed. The results of calculations using this formula made it possible to evaluate several options for hardening the processing of samples and establish preferable ones. These options were samples hardened by boration and surfacing of metal powders in a liquid coolant. The proposed formula allows predicting the value of the resource of the working bodies of tillage and sowing units during their hardening, restoration and manufacturing process.

Целью настоящей статьи является исследование внутренней логики развития экономической науки как причины формирования парадигмального взгляда на развитие современной экономики. Факторов-причин, влияющих на формирование нового парадигмального взгляда на фундаментальное основание экономической науки, достаточно много [2, с. 58-64]. Среди них можно назвать, например, такие, как критерии научной достоверности в их историко-диалектическом жизненном цикле, новые стандарты научной аргументации с учетом резкого падения качества статистических данных и возможности использования фактов, шумонаполняемость понятийного аппарата науки (например - бургерэкономика, билингвальность, иммерсивный сторителлинг). Авторами обосновано, что одним из направлений перестройки научного мышления является становление полицентрического образа фундаментальной экономической науки. Научная новизна полученных результатов заключается в формулировании принципов и критериев классификации экономических знаний, а также в доказательстве продуктивности определения названия фундаментальной основы экономической науки, как общей экономической теории. The purpose of this article is to study the internal logic of the development of economic science, as the reason for the formation of a paradigmatic view of the development of modern economics. There are a lot of factors-reasons influencing the formation of a new paradigmatic view of the fundamental basis of economic science [2, p. 58-64]. Among them, one can name, for example, criteria of scientific reliability in their historical-dialectical life cycle, new standards of scientific argumentation, taking into account a sharp drop in the quality of statistical data and the possibility of using facts, noise filling of the conceptual apparatus of science (for example, burger economics, bilingualism, immersive storytelling). The authors substantiated that one of the directions of the restructuring of scientific thinking is the formation of a polycentric image of fundamental economic science. The scientific novelty of the results obtained lies in the formulation of principles and criteria for the classification of economic knowledge, as well as in the proof of the productivity of determining the name of the fundamental basis of economic science as a general economic theory.

Noonomics in the concept of the noosphere in its origin involves the formulation of theoretical and methodological prerequisites for inclusion in the structure of economic knowledge, both in engineering and in digital economics. One of them can be a spatial approach based on the concept of multidimensional and multilevel economic space. Based on the above, the authors define the purpose of the article as the institutionalization of the conceptual representation of noonomics with the use of the approach and the development of the methodology of noonomical research. The novelty of the work is the revealed specificity of the hierarchical structure of the three-level economic space based on the use of reproduction-level meta-system analysis. The history of the development of the definition of the content of the concept of “system” will soon celebrate its centenary, at the same time, a paradigm system concept has not yet been created. There is an evolution of the concept of system, including the ontological, gnostic, and epistemological meaning of the concept. Without setting the search criteria for distinguishing between certain systems, only one type of system was chosen for the analysis out of all their huge set – the economic system. We have defined the content of the concept of "economic system" in the sense that will allow us to use it in the future when including economic systems of different levels, including regional ones, in the structure of a multidimensional economic space. It is shown that innovation clusters play an important role in the formation of the economy in the regions.