This article explores the importance of protecting children’s rights in the context of the rapid development of artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence has the potential to change many aspects of a child’s life, and while it can have positive effects, its negative impact also needs due consideration.The article focuses on four key aspects: privacy, security, discrimination and ethics. It analyzes the risks associated with the collection and processing of children’s personal data by artificial intelligence and requires the establishment of effective privacy protection mechanisms. In addition, it considers the safety of children, especially in the context of the use of autonomous robots and toys, and safety standards that are required to be taken into account in the development of such systems.The article also focuses on the problem of discrimination that may arise from the systematic use of artificial intelligence. It demands developers to ensure the fairness of algorithms and avoid discrimination against children. Finally, the article considers the ethical aspects of the use of artificial intelligence, namely the question of the responsibility of developers and the need for ethical principles in all aspects of its use.In conclusion, the article emphasizes the need for constant monitoring and regulation of the development of artificial intelligence in order to protect the rights of the child. It recommends the implementation of an effective legislative framework that defines standards for the protection of children’s rights in the context of artificial intelligence. In addition, the article puts forward the idea of developing ethical directives and codes of conduct for developers, researchers and users of artificial intelligence from the perspective of children’s rights.In general, this scientific article emphasizes the importance of protecting the rights of the child in the context of the development of artificial intelligence. It calls for action at the level of legislation, technological standards and ethical principles, ensuring safety, privacy, non-discrimination and ethical responsibility in all aspects of the use of artificial intelligence to ensure the healthy development and protection of children’s rights in the digital age.Also, the article is devoted to the analysis of the controversial issue of the relationship between child rights and artificial intelligence. The article examines the consequences of the use of artificial intelligence in the context of children’s rights, the main issues related to the legal protection of children in the field of artificial intelligence, and suggests possible solutions for these problems.

It is indicated that in the context of the development of Ukraine as a legal state, the modern development of human rights in Ukraine, the evolution of civil society, the development of the legal status of refugees and Ukrainians abroad, migration processes, the study of the issue of the concept of the constitutional and legal status of Ukrainians abroad is of important practical and theoretical importance. The issue of the evolution of political and legal opinion regarding the constitutional and legal status of Ukrainians abroad becomes important considering the modern development of the constitutional and legal status of Ukrainians abroad, migration processes, globalization, the need for effective protection of the rights and legitimate interests of Ukrainians abroad, as well as the preservation of their linguistic and cultural identity. cooperation of Ukraine with Ukrainians abroad, their communities and non-governmental organizations. The evolution of political and legal opinion regarding the constitutional and legal status of Ukrainians abroad has been going on for a long time and has already gone through various stages. As part of the evolution of political and legal opinion regarding the constitutional and legal status of Ukrainians abroad, the following stages can be distinguished:1. The stage from the times of Kyivan Rus until 1917.2. The period of the Ukrainian national liberation struggle of 1917-1922.3. Stage of Soviet Ukraine.4. The stage of formation of the foundations of the constitutional and legal status of Ukrainians abroad in independent Ukraine from August 24, 1991 to March 4, 2004.5. The newest stage of the development of the constitutional and legal status of Ukrainians abroad, which began on March 4, 2004, after the adoption of the Law of Ukraine “On Ukrainians Abroad”. The first of the above-mentioned stages of the evolution of political and legal opinion regarding the constitutional and legal status of Ukrainians abroad is considered in more detail.

The scientific article is devoted to the study of the general principles of implementation of the principle of independence of the prosecutor’s office. It is noted that, as of today, the prosecutor’s office occupies a prominent place in the system of state authorities, since, in accordance with the current legislation, it is entrusted with a number of important powers regarding the maintenance of public accusations, participation in pre-trial investigations, representation of the interests of the state and citizens in court proceedings, etc. Based on the above, the issue of researching the principle of independence of the prosecutor’s office takes on special importance, since the quality of the prosecutor’s office’s performance of its functions depends on the proper implementation of this principle. It has been established that the principle of independence of the prosecutor’s office is an important basis for the organization and functioning of the prosecutor’s office in any state, and its implementation is largely closely related to the application of other principles of the activity of the said legal institution. The independence of the prosecutor’s office takes place where the prosecutor can exercise his powers without fear or favor, without being subjected to undue pressure from state authorities and local self-government, their officials and officials, individual politicians, mass media, and other subjects. Public trust in the prosecutor and the prosecutor’s office as a whole, which ultimately depends on the public’s confidence in the prosecutor’s office’s observance of the principle of the rule of law, is of great importance in this context. It has been determined that the independence of the prosecutor’s office can be considered in two aspects - as the independence of the prosecutor’s office from other state authorities (institutional independence) and as the independence of each individual prosecutor (individual independence). In summary, even if the prosecutor’s office as an institution is independent, the prosecutor’s office may still be organized according to a hierarchy, which provides that an individual prosecutor may be subject to the instructions of another prosecutor. There are legal systems where the prosecutor’s office is modeled after the judiciary and is even a part of it. There is a third option, according to which the prosecutor’s office is part of the executive branch of government and is under its accountability. All this should be taken into account when studying the principle of independence of the prosecutor’s office.

The article emphasizes that political parties contribute to the formation and expression of the political will of citizens. Thanks to them, citizens of Ukraine can exercise their right to freely choose and be elected to state and local government bodies. A form of direct democracy, in addition to elections, is a referendum. Attention is focused on the fact that the financing of political parties, pre-election campaigning or referendum campaigning can be the tool that, in the presence of deficiencies in the current legislation regulating social relations that arise when giving or receiving a contribution to support a political party, or when receiving state funding of a statutory activities of a political party, or when providing or receiving financial (material) support for pre election campaigning or referendum campaigning, may be used to suppress the will of voters. Attention is also drawn to such a phenomenon as political corruption. It is established that the fines for violating the rules of political party financing, pre-election campaigning or referendum campaigning are disproportionate to the amount of money that any political party receives and spends during elections. The consequence of this is that the amount of the fine fixed in the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses, the Criminal Code of Ukraine, is not a safeguard against violations. The amount of money spent on political advertising and pre-election campaigning and the amount of fines for violating the rules of political financing are disproportionate. It is proposed to amend the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses, applying an approach according to which the fine is 100% of the amount of illegal contributions or support received, but not less than 100 tax-free minimum incomes of citizens. If the reporting procedure is violated, the fine is at least 1,000 tax-free minimum incomes of citizens. The shortcomings of the legislation of Ukraine consist in the fact that the provision of financial (material) support for campaigning or in favor of a political party is equated with the transfer of ownership; for criminal offenses characterized by a greater degree of public danger, fines are lower than for administrative violations. Ways to improve the current legislation of Ukraine are proposed, including, in Art. 159 1 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine is proposed to provide for such a sanction as confiscation of property.

The article is devoted to the study of the concept of the constitutional and legal mechanism of financial support for the preparation and holding of elections of People’s Deputies of Ukraine. Attention is focused on the fact that the financing of elections should be an object of regulation in order to prevent and counteract such a phenomenon as corruption and such a phenomenon as the implementation of illegal extraterritorial behavior of one state against another through civilians – members of parliaments. Attention is focused on the fact that Russia, using financial resources, influenced the elections of people’s deputies of Ukraine, starting with the revival of Ukraine’s independence in 1991, and tried to endanger the functioning of democratic institutions in Ukraine and the development of Ukraine as a sovereign democratic independent state. It is emphasized that the attempt of the aggressor state - Russia - to exercise illegal but effective control through pro-Russian political forces in Ukraine was carried out with the use of various financial instruments of influence and manipulation in the elections of people’s deputies of Ukraine. The article analyzes international documents devoted to the issues of the constitutional and legal mechanism of financial support for the preparation and conduct of elections. Signs of such a mechanism were identified based on the analysis of the provisions of each of these documents. Also, from the definitions of the concepts of the constitutional and legal mechanism of security, which are contained in the doctrine of the constitutional law of Ukraine, signs of this mechanism were revealed. The following author’s definition of the concept of the constitutional-legal mechanism of financial support for the preparation and holding of elections of People’s Deputies of Ukraine is a system of organizational-legal and legal means of influence, with the help of which financial opportunities are created for the realization of the right of a citizen of Ukraine to be elected to the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, and in the case violation or threat of violation of this right - its protection and protection is carried out.