The aim: To study the constitutional and legal principles and the influence of various factors on the mechanism of realization of somatic rights in the process of biomedical research. Materials and methods: Formal-logical methods of analysis and synthesis allowed to reveal the content of the concepts that make up the subject of research, to classify them, as well as to formulate intermediate and general conclusions. The systematic method allowed to study the role and significance of somatic human rights among other human and civil rights and freedoms. Using the historical method, the doctrinal basis of the study was analyzed, and the main stages of the formation of biomedical research with human participation were identified. Conclusions: The historiography of somatic human rights in biomedical research in a broad sense is a field of scientific knowledge. Studies the development of constitutional and legal science and its patterns; in the narrow sense, it is a set of works on various problems of the history of modern constitutionalism, human rights, the influence of religion on human rights and the mechanism of their implementation and protection in a certain historical period.

This article explores the importance of protecting children’s rights in the context of the rapid development of artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence has the potential to change many aspects of a child’s life, and while it can have positive effects, its negative impact also needs due consideration.The article focuses on four key aspects: privacy, security, discrimination and ethics. It analyzes the risks associated with the collection and processing of children’s personal data by artificial intelligence and requires the establishment of effective privacy protection mechanisms. In addition, it considers the safety of children, especially in the context of the use of autonomous robots and toys, and safety standards that are required to be taken into account in the development of such systems.The article also focuses on the problem of discrimination that may arise from the systematic use of artificial intelligence. It demands developers to ensure the fairness of algorithms and avoid discrimination against children. Finally, the article considers the ethical aspects of the use of artificial intelligence, namely the question of the responsibility of developers and the need for ethical principles in all aspects of its use.In conclusion, the article emphasizes the need for constant monitoring and regulation of the development of artificial intelligence in order to protect the rights of the child. It recommends the implementation of an effective legislative framework that defines standards for the protection of children’s rights in the context of artificial intelligence. In addition, the article puts forward the idea of developing ethical directives and codes of conduct for developers, researchers and users of artificial intelligence from the perspective of children’s rights.In general, this scientific article emphasizes the importance of protecting the rights of the child in the context of the development of artificial intelligence. It calls for action at the level of legislation, technological standards and ethical principles, ensuring safety, privacy, non-discrimination and ethical responsibility in all aspects of the use of artificial intelligence to ensure the healthy development and protection of children’s rights in the digital age.Also, the article is devoted to the analysis of the controversial issue of the relationship between child rights and artificial intelligence. The article examines the consequences of the use of artificial intelligence in the context of children’s rights, the main issues related to the legal protection of children in the field of artificial intelligence, and suggests possible solutions for these problems.

It is indicated that the military aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine caused the largest displacement of citizens of our country. Most of our citizens were accepted by Poland. Since the beginning of the full-scale invasion, almost 6 million people have crossed its border (perhaps a certain part did not stop in Poland, but moved on to Europe). At the same time, many people are returning home. Everyone's reasons for returning are individual, one of them is the financial difficulties faced by citizens abroad, despite the help provided to them by both EU states and volunteers. It was noted that the concepts of "refugees" and "displaced persons (internally displaced persons)" are by no means identical from a legal point of view. An internally displaced person is a person who was forced to leave his place of residence as a result of or in order to avoid the negative consequences of armed conflict, temporary occupation, widespread manifestations of violence, violations of human rights and emergency situations of a natural or man-made nature. It is emphasized that internally displaced persons remain within their own country, unlike refugees. The legal definition of a "refugee" may differ slightly in different countries of the world, but its key characteristic is forced migration beyond the borders of one's country of origin and seeking asylum abroad. It was noted that the digitalization policy is aimed at facilitating the interaction between people and the state. When a country becomes "digital", it attracts the attention of investors. Building a digital country is a course for economic success. So far, it is difficult to talk about successes or failures in this area, since we are only at the beginning of this journey. However, we can already say that Ukraine is developing in the direction of the European Union, actively introducing digital technologies. In the conditions of war, in order to protect the rights of refugees and IDPs, it is digitalization that contributes to the harmonious functioning of the mechanism for protecting the rights of the above-mentioned persons.

No abstract

The article reveals the peculiarities of the normative and legal consolidation of the human right to life. The authors pay attention to the provisions of the decisions of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine that carry out the interpretation of the human right to life.