Background. Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most frequent malignant neoplasm originating from follicular cells of thyroid gland. PTC is often coexisting with other benign thyroid pathology such as chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis, follicular thyroid adenoma, toxic thyroid adenoma, Graves’ disease, non-toxic multinodular goiter. PTC can be diagnosed in patients undergoing surgical treatment for hyperparathyroidism. However, the clinical and pathomorphological features of PTC in the presence of other benign thyroid or parathyroid pathology, as well as possible differences in surgical tactics, remain relevant as evidenced by previously published reports. The purpose of the study is to assess the prevalence and determine the differences in the clinical and pathomorphological parameters of PTC in the presence of benign thyroid and parathyroid pathology. Materials and methods. There were identified 91 patients with PTC, who underwent surgical treatment at the clinical bases of the Department of Surgery of the NSC “Institute of Biology and Medicine” of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Results. In the studied PTC cohort, 31 (35 %) patients were without coexisted benign thyroid pathology and 60 (35 %) patients had it (PTC/coexisted). A statistically significantly higher number of mitoses per 10 high power fields in the PTC group were identified in 3 (10 %) patients, as compared to the absence of this pathohistological parameter in the PTC/coexisted (p = 0.037). Further analysis of these 3 cases showed that 4 mitotic figures were found in one PTC, and one mitotic figure in the other two cases per 10 high power fields (400×). Conclusions. Papillary thyroid carcinoma in patients with other benign thyroid pathology is associated with lower biological aggressiveness than PTC without comorbidity as evidenced by a lower frequency of mitotic figures per 10 high power fields. The presence of concomitant benign thyroid pathology can be considered as a favorable prognostic factor for patients with PTC.

The management of antithrombotic drugs in the perioperative period requires a multidisciplinary approach with the participation of the operating surgeon, anesthesiologist, and a responsible physician. In the guidelines of the leading specialized associations of France, Italy, Spain, Great Britain, USA, Poland, the recommendations of the European Society of Anesthesiologists, the American College of Thoracic Physicians and other world professional organizations the approaches have been systematized to the management of anticoagulants (vitamin K and direct antagonists, including new oral anticoagulants), the safety of the antiplatelet drugs using in the perioperative period to prevent increased bleeding and minimize thromboembolic complications after invasive procedures in patients with a high risk of cardiovascular events. We have provided algorithms for convenient perception of information and memorization and subsequent implementation them in clinical practice.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract