2006 IEEE International Symposium on Power Semiconductor Devices &Amp; IC's
DOI: 10.1109/ispsd.2006.1666129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 15.5mΩcm>sup<2>/sup<-680V Superjunction MOSFET Reduced On-Resistance by Lateral Pitch Narrowing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
3

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For the SJ devices with V B lower than 100 V, the optimized device was obtained by shrinking the cell pitch with the width of the P-regions only 0.7 to 1 μm [12] . For the SJ devices with V B from 100 to 500 V, the optimized result was realized by the trench epitaxy process with the high aspect ratio [13] . For the SJ devices with V B over 500 V, the optimized device of the multi-epitaxy was obtained by implanting both the N and P regions in a 12 μm cell pitch and the optimized…”
Section: Development Of the Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the SJ devices with V B lower than 100 V, the optimized device was obtained by shrinking the cell pitch with the width of the P-regions only 0.7 to 1 μm [12] . For the SJ devices with V B from 100 to 500 V, the optimized result was realized by the trench epitaxy process with the high aspect ratio [13] . For the SJ devices with V B over 500 V, the optimized device of the multi-epitaxy was obtained by implanting both the N and P regions in a 12 μm cell pitch and the optimized…”
Section: Development Of the Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nous avons envisagé ce type de structure car les méthodes de fabrication industrielle actuelles se basent sur des implantations fortes énergies [47], [48], ou sur une succession d'épitaxies et d'implantations [34], [41], [49], [50], ou sur une gravure profonde suivie d'une croissance épitaxiale [32], [33], [51]. Ces différentes techniques étant coûteuses, il était intéressant de proposer une solution adaptée à une tenue en tension de 1200 V. La principale différence avec la Superjonction conventionnelle est le profil de dopage de la colonne P ( Figure II.12).…”
Section: Ii241 Présentation De La Structureunclassified
“…Il existe donc une limite entre la dose implantée et la concentration de la couche épitaxiée. Aujourd'hui, les meilleurs transistors SJMOS présentent une taille de cellule élémentaire de 12 μm pour une concentration des colonnes de 3,3.10 15 cm -3 [34].…”
Section: Ii32 Choix Entre Les Deux Structures à Superjonctionunclassified
“…The super-junction (SJ) VDMOS has attracted a great deal of attention owing to its improvement on the specific onresistance (R on,sp ) and the better trade-off between the R on,sp and breakdown voltage (BV). [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] However, the R on,sp is still determined by the doping concentration of the drift region. For high voltage SJ VDMOS, narrowing the width of the pillars is a good choice to improve the N n and reduce the R on,sp , but the fabrication is hard to realize.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%