2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbsr.2021.100444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A label free nanosensing platform for the detection of cervical cancer through analysis of ultratrace DNA hybridization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since no label is attached to the molecules, therefore, the actual nature and data of the biodegradable material remain constant. Furthermore, it is possible to use the biosensors in cancer research for analyzing the changes in proteins or target cell lines [51]. Therefore, all-optical biosensors have been recognized to be proper for disposable rapid detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since no label is attached to the molecules, therefore, the actual nature and data of the biodegradable material remain constant. Furthermore, it is possible to use the biosensors in cancer research for analyzing the changes in proteins or target cell lines [51]. Therefore, all-optical biosensors have been recognized to be proper for disposable rapid detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional strategies for detecting the presence of HPV-16 infections includes histological measurements and analysing cytological fluctuations using biopsy or Papanicolaou (Pap) screening methods [ 4 ]. The strategies involving the latter, hybrid capture assay and colposcopy, suffer from low sensitivity and specificity while being time consuming [ 5 ]. Meanwhile, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has comparatively high sensitivity and is currently being widely employed for HPV detection, albeit with limitations of its own, such as the requirement of skilled manpower, high cost per test and tedious DNA extraction protocol [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategies involving the latter, hybrid capture assay and colposcopy, suffer from low sensitivity and specificity while being time consuming [ 5 ]. Meanwhile, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has comparatively high sensitivity and is currently being widely employed for HPV detection, albeit with limitations of its own, such as the requirement of skilled manpower, high cost per test and tedious DNA extraction protocol [ 5 ]. Furthermore, the presence of limited cyto technicians in every hospital or clinic in developing nations has detrimental effects on the affected patients, leading to delayed treatment with dreadful outcomes [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Today, most of the electrochemical methods of detecting HPV have been focused on nucleic acid (DNA) sensors. To our knowledge, the use of protein biomarkers for the electrochemical detection of HPV is largely unknown. There are only a few reports that attempted the utilization of HPV protein biomarkers. , For example, Piro et al reported the use of a very complex conjugated electro-co-polymer to encapsulate the antigenic HPV-16 L1 on a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) and used it to detect just a single concentration of the anti-HPV-16 L1 antibody.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%