2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2010.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simplified method for detecting pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in slaughtered pig tonsils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Isolation of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica from naturally contaminated samples without enrichment is seldom successful (Fredriksson-Ahomaa and Korkeala, 2003); however, for tonsil samples, direct plating is a fast alternative as in most samples background flora on a selective agar medium is minimal and the number of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica is sufficiently high (Fredriksson-Ahomaa et al, 2007;Van Damme et al, 2010). A disadvantage of current conventional media is the difficulty to distinguish pathogenic Y. enterocolitica from non-pathogenic yersiniae and many other Gram-negative bacteria (de Boer, 1992;Fondrevez et al, 2010). To facilitate this differentiation, Weagant (2008) recently designed a chromogenic agar medium, called Y. enterocolitica chromogenic medium (YeCM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Isolation of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica from naturally contaminated samples without enrichment is seldom successful (Fredriksson-Ahomaa and Korkeala, 2003); however, for tonsil samples, direct plating is a fast alternative as in most samples background flora on a selective agar medium is minimal and the number of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica is sufficiently high (Fredriksson-Ahomaa et al, 2007;Van Damme et al, 2010). A disadvantage of current conventional media is the difficulty to distinguish pathogenic Y. enterocolitica from non-pathogenic yersiniae and many other Gram-negative bacteria (de Boer, 1992;Fondrevez et al, 2010). To facilitate this differentiation, Weagant (2008) recently designed a chromogenic agar medium, called Y. enterocolitica chromogenic medium (YeCM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When monitoring Y. enterocolitica in pigs at slaughter, tonsils are regarded as the sample of choice (Fredriksson-Ahomaa et al, 2001;Nesbakken et al, 2003). Swab samples from tonsils have been used in several studies (Andersen et al, 1991;Fondrevez et al, 2010;Kechagia et al, 2007), since sampling and processing is easier and less time-consuming compared to tissue samples. Therefore, this study evaluates if swab samples have a good predictive value for the presence of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in pig tonsils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the combination usage of modified CIN with a chromogenic media, such as CHROMagar Yersinia [15] and YECA [18], and YeCM [19], may help eliminate non-pathogenic Yersinia without the need to conduct additional biochemical tests [23]. This combination usage may also reduce the false-positive results caused by wrong colour interpretations by the user [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the true positive Y. enterocolitica isolates increased by nearly 27% and 10% on modified CIN compared to CIN in artificially prepared bacterial mixture and artificially contaminated pork, respectively (Table 4). The capability of modified CIN in reducing the number of false positive Y. enterocolitica isolates, especially in eliminating H 2 S-producing Citrobacter spp., M. morganii, P. rettgeri, A. hydrophila, E. cloacae can shorten the processing time and reduce the workload and costs associated with biochemical assays that were reported in many studies [13], [14], [15], [16], [23], [32]. Higher recovery rates from the modified CIN compared with that of CIN was further demonstrated using naturally contaminated samples (rectal swabs from swine, Table 2), indicating the modified CIN improved the recovery of Y. enterocolitica even on actual samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation