1990
DOI: 10.1016/0167-6636(90)90016-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A soft-recovery plate impact experiment for studying microcracking in ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main purpose is to use the shock wave as a probe, first to introduce damage (and compaction if the ceramic is porous) in a controlled manner and then to study the resulting damage [185][186][187]. Such damage studies cannot be done by quasi-static high-pressure diamond-anvil compression studies.…”
Section: Brittle Materials: Ceramics and Glassesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main purpose is to use the shock wave as a probe, first to introduce damage (and compaction if the ceramic is porous) in a controlled manner and then to study the resulting damage [185][186][187]. Such damage studies cannot be done by quasi-static high-pressure diamond-anvil compression studies.…”
Section: Brittle Materials: Ceramics and Glassesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 indicate that more damage occurs in Shot Rec01 when compared to the other two experiments. The post-test specimens are observed to be radially cracked in each case, perhaps due to a combination of boundary release waves and tensile stresses resulting from bending/flexure of the specimen during impact [18,20]. More importantly, the recovered granite specimens have the same thickness as prior to impact, indicating the absence of spall failure in the three experiments.…”
Section: Soft-recovery Plate-impact Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…State (7) State (1) State (2) State ( conditions such that damage is confined to regions of highly localized stresses and the surrounding regions of lower stress provide resistance to the coalescence and propagation of macrocracks. In order to achieve this, an eight-pointed star-shaped flyer [18,19] is used to subject a central octagonal region of the granite specimen to a plane compressive pulse. A momentum trap (quartz) sitting behind the target specimen is used to prevent reloading of the specimen except of an initial tensile pulse reflected from a pre-set gap between the specimen and the momentum trap.…”
Section: Plate Impact Spall Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, a longitudinal plane pulse (1) induces a mode II crack deformation field; the competition between the inertial resistance and Poisson's effect creates a mode I deformation weak field, and the cylindrical waves (2)-(8) generate a mixed-mode deformation field. In this study, we directly measure variations of the compressive stress pulses using the Mn-Cu gauge technique [Raiser et al 1990;Fowles et al 1970]. To validate the measurements, we compare the amplitudes of stress pulses with the calculated values based on the measured impact speeds V 0 and the elastodynamic relation, σ 0 = ρc l V 0 /2.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental setup. The experiment consists of the following: a pressure-shear gas gun for producing the compressive stress pulses; Mn-Cu stress gauge units for directly measuring the compressive stress-time profiles [Ma 1998]; a soft recovery apparatus [Raiser et al 1990]; two electrical circuits, one for measuring the projectile impact velocities and another for examining the misalignment angles between the impacting planes.…”
Section: Components In the Collision Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%