2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of Individual Transferable Quotas (ITQs) in Japanese fisheries: A comparison of rights-based fisheries management in Iceland, Japan, and United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Setting a TAC and allocation of catch to each vessel or fisher as individual quotas (IQs) or individual transferable quotas (ITQs) is also a powerful tool for fisheries management [40][41][42][43][44]. As described earlier, TACs have been introduced for eight species in Japan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Setting a TAC and allocation of catch to each vessel or fisher as individual quotas (IQs) or individual transferable quotas (ITQs) is also a powerful tool for fisheries management [40][41][42][43][44]. As described earlier, TACs have been introduced for eight species in Japan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual Transferable Quotas (ITQs), fishing cooperatives, and Territorial Use Rights in Fisheries (TURFs) are the three different forms under which RBFM operates. ITQs and fishing cooperatives are both efficient management techniques, albeit with differing emphasis on decision-making and the role of the commercial fisheries within the greater ecosystem (Arnason, 2012;Deacon, 2012;Yagi et al, 2012). Implementing ITQs can have negative distributional impacts for communities that cooperative agreements may more easily resolve.…”
Section: Further Examples Theory and Practice Of Resource Use And Govmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fishing industry has been and still is an extremely important part of the rural economy of Iceland. Since 1984 structural changes have steadily emerged, following the fleet´s efficiency optimization, aiming for reduced harvesting cost and increased profitability (Hannesson 2004, Arnason 2005, Arnason 1993, (Eythórsson 2000, Gissurarson 2000, Arnason 2002, Yagi et al 2012, Christensen, Hegland and Oddsson 2009. Restrictions on quota transferability within the uniform ITQ system were lifted in 1990, encouraging optimization of the industry.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transferability also resulted in quota displacements between geographical regions, negatively affecting some fishing communities (Eythórsson 2000, Yagi et al 2012, Skaptadottir 2000, Eythórsson 1996, Danielsson 1997). In 1998 a maximum quota share was introduced to restrict a company's quota allowance in terms of total catch share, as well as individual species (Ministry of Industries and Innovation 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation