Assessing the Innovative Solvency of Regional Exports in the Russian Federation

Abstract

Aim. The presented study aims to develop a methodology for assessing the innovative solvency of exports from Russian regions and to identify the leading exporting regions in the development of the country’s innovative exports. Tasks. The authors clarify the definition of ‘innovative solvency of regional exports’; develop a methodology for assessing the innovative component of regional exports; test methodological recommendations for assessing the innovative solvency of exports through the example of industrial regions. Methods. The approach to determining the innovative solvency of regional exports is based on a matrix measurement method using two-component evaluation tools. This method also makes it possible to compare the level of the region’s existing foreign economic relations with the level of the regional production system when considering the latter as a resource and a prerequisite for further increasing the level of innovation in exports; to assess the degree of regional potential realization through a separate comparison of the indicators of commodity production and exports of goods and indicators reflecting the level of production technologies and their exports. Results. A typology of exporting regions is proposed based on the synthesis of two criteria: the level of development of the innovative component in the exports of the region and the level of development of advanced innovative technologies in the region. The study confirms the hypothesis about the heterogeneity of Russian regions in terms of the innovative component of their exports, which has a direct impact on the development of the corresponding regional development strategies. Of the 34 exporting regions analyzed, only 16 regions can be identified as exporters of innovative goods. Conclusions. The methodology proposed by the authors makes it possible to qualitatively assess the innovative component of regional exports based on quantitative data, which reveals the potential of the regional production system for innovative production, and to compare it with the existing and projected levels of innovative exports. The practical significance of this study consists in the formation of a list of regions leading in innovative exports, which can be useful for public authorities when adjusting programs aimed at stimulating innovation activity and forming an export-oriented national economy.

Жоғары Сынып Оқушыларының Есептік Ойлауын Дамытуға Бағытталған Әл-Фарабидің Тригонометриясын Оқыту Мазмұны Мен Құрылымы

“…According to the definition of the modern didactician V. I. Zagvyazinsky, "The principle of learning is knowledge of the essence, content and structure of learning in the form of norms of activity, instructions, rules, its laws and patterns." Analyzing the work in the field of modular training, we can highlight the following principles of its organization: modularity, structuring, dynamism, activity, problematic, variability, adaptability, flexibility, continuity, implementation of feedback, conscious perspective and parity [9].…”

Innovative viability: formation of the concept and evaluation criteria

“…Шамова Е.А., Мыслякова Ю.Г. [15] предложили методику оценки инновационной состоятельности экспорта российских регионов и уточнили определение «инновационная состоятельность» применительно к региональному экспортеру; авторы опираются в определении инновационной состоятельности на два компонента: уровень развития инновационной составляющей в экспорте региона и уровень развития инновационных технологий в регион, сопоставляя тем самым состояние технологического развития региона и результативность инноваций (экспортная составляющая), таким образом, предпринята попытка «сбалансировать / сопоставить» эти два компонента. Мыслякова Ю.Г., Кислов Р.С.…”

“…Проведя анализ научной литературы по теме «состоятельность», выявлено, что состоятельность рассматривается как социальная [12], состоятельность менеджмента [13] производственная, рыночная, социальная, экологическая, финансовая состоятельность [14]. Понятию «инновационная состоятельность» посвящено только две работы [15][16]. Понятие «инновационная состоятельность» в зарубежной научной литературе не рассматривается, исследуются только проблемы жизнеспособности (viability) инноваций [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], хотя, наверное, такой перевод слова «состоятельность» более чем удачен, ярко отражает целесообразность состоятельности -поддержание жизнеспособности.…”