2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-009-9728-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the vulnerability of European butterflies to climate change using multiple criteria

Abstract: Vulnerability of 100 European butterfly species to climate change was assessed using 13 different criteria and data on species distributions, climate, land cover and topography from 1,608 grid squares 30 0 9 60 0 in size, and species characteristics increasing the susceptibility to climate change. Four bioclimatic model-based criteria were developed for each species by comparing the present-day distribution and climatic suitability of the occupied grid cells with projected distribution and suitability in the f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(154 reference statements)
1
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach allowed us to identify characteristics of U.K. butterfly species that best predicted their degree of phenological advancement. Further investigation of the mechanisms by which these characteristics influence phenology may aid in understanding vulnerability to climate change (Heikkinen et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach allowed us to identify characteristics of U.K. butterfly species that best predicted their degree of phenological advancement. Further investigation of the mechanisms by which these characteristics influence phenology may aid in understanding vulnerability to climate change (Heikkinen et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…comm.). Four projects have used expert knowledge to obtain mobility estimates for European butterflies (Bink 1992 as cited in Stevens et al 2010;Cowley et al 2001;Komonen et al 2004;Heikkinen et al 2010), each differing somewhat in their methodology but producing consistent results (consistency between the first three studies is analyzed in Stevens et al 2010b). Our study differs from these European studies in target taxa (North American as opposed to European butterflies), our larger scale (more respondents, more species, and greater spatial extent), and our development and use of methods to address data accuracy issues that may arise with knowledge-based data (see below).…”
Section: Labmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several species-specific attributes have been identified as increasing species' vulnerability to climate change, including diets, migratory strategy, main habitat types and ecological specialization [5][6][7] . Moreover, although phenotypic plasticity may enable some species to respond rapidly and effectively to climate change 8,9 , others may suffer from the induced spatial mismatch and temporal mistiming with their resources 10,11 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%