SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2016 2016
DOI: 10.1190/segam2016-13962843.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic S-wave picking based on time-frequency analysis for passive seismic applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A characteristic function is generally constructed from the single receiver recording in single-level algorithms, and the maximum of the characteristic difference is chosen as the arrival time of the microseismic signal. The short-and long-time average ratio method (STA/LTA) [11,12], Akaike information criterion method (AIC) [13], polarization-based method [14], higher-order statistics such as skewness and the kurtosisbased method [15,16], and the time-frequency analysis method [17] are commonly used single-level methods. Hybrid algorithms have also been proposed to achieve more accurate and precise arrival-time results for low signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) events by combining information from one or more individual picking algorithms [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A characteristic function is generally constructed from the single receiver recording in single-level algorithms, and the maximum of the characteristic difference is chosen as the arrival time of the microseismic signal. The short-and long-time average ratio method (STA/LTA) [11,12], Akaike information criterion method (AIC) [13], polarization-based method [14], higher-order statistics such as skewness and the kurtosisbased method [15,16], and the time-frequency analysis method [17] are commonly used single-level methods. Hybrid algorithms have also been proposed to achieve more accurate and precise arrival-time results for low signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) events by combining information from one or more individual picking algorithms [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the microseismic events had been identified, the arrivals of records were picked. Karastathis [14] used time-frequency analysis to obtain a picking method of the first arrival of microseism, and compared with the traditional method, the picking accuracy was improved significantly. Massin [15] used the component energy correlation method to identify microseismic body waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First break picking is a fundamental, but important step, in three-component (3C) vertical seismic profiling (VSP) data processing, such as velocity estimation, wave-field separation, and anisotropy estimates [ 1 ]. Any errors and/or misidentifications of these arrival times may have significant effects on the static corrections and velocity inversion [ 2 ], including the structural and lithological investigation employing passive seismic tomography methodologies [ 3 ]. During the last few decades, various techniques have been developed for determining first breaks automatically or semi-automatically [ 4 ], such as automatic methods available that are based on the correlation properties, on some statistical criteria, or on artificial neural networks for both individual and groups of traces [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%