2001
DOI: 10.1080/02723646.2001.10642733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Tree Species Sensitivity to High and Low Extreme Hydroclimatic Events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding suggests that drought, which is often accompanied by high vapor pressure deficit, has a greater negative effect on stomatal aperture and photosynthesis of P. flexilis than P. ponderosa. Despite their high elevation ranges on relatively mesic sites in southwestern USA, our results and others (Biondi 2000;Hidalgo et al 2001) indicate that growth of P. menziesii and P. flexilis is clearly sensitive to drought.…”
Section: Species/populationcontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding suggests that drought, which is often accompanied by high vapor pressure deficit, has a greater negative effect on stomatal aperture and photosynthesis of P. flexilis than P. ponderosa. Despite their high elevation ranges on relatively mesic sites in southwestern USA, our results and others (Biondi 2000;Hidalgo et al 2001) indicate that growth of P. menziesii and P. flexilis is clearly sensitive to drought.…”
Section: Species/populationcontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Drought is the most limiting factor to tree growth in southwestern USA (Fritts 1976: Meko et al 1995: Swetnam and Betancourt 1998: Hidalgo et al 2001. Climate change models predict higher temperatures and increased variability in precipitation in the future for the Southwest (Gregory et al 1997;Rosenberg et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa), pinyon pine (Pinus edulis), and Douglasfir (Pseudotsuga menziesii), known to be sensitive to moisture (Schulman 1956;Hidalgo et al 2001), were targeted for collection. A total of 28 sites was sampled, and at the time of this analysis, 15 had been developed into tree-ring chronologies (Fig.…”
Section: B Tree-ring Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the Palmer drought indexes were developed to interpret 20th Century variations; the negative mean suggests that the period of 1500s through the 1800s was much drier than the historical record from the early 1900s. Although the observational period presents one of the wettest period on record and therefore the reconstructed mean of the Palmer indexes would tend to be negative, it is known also that tree‐ring chronologies from this region generally tend to present a bias towards the dry periods since tree‐ring growth is more responsive to hot‐dry than cool‐moist extreme conditions (Hidalgo et al. , 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%