2015
DOI: 10.5559/di.24.3.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demographic Resources as an Indicator and Factor of the Regional Development Disparity in Croatia

Abstract: Suvremeni razvoj Hrvatske opterećen je izrazitim regionalnim disparitetima. Kako su razlike u socioekonomskoj razvijenosti ključni generator prostorne pokretljivosti stanovništva, to se odražava i na atrofiju demografskih resursa slabije razvijenih područja, a na taj način i destabilizaciju njihove naseljenosti. Zbog uzajamne povezanosti gospodarskoga i demografskog razvoja, u radu su pobliže razmotreni demografski resursi kao indikator i čimbenik dispariteta u regionalnom razvoju države. Istraženi su demograf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to this paper, some of the previous studies conducted their research of regional inequalities and classification of local communities based on combination of factor and cluster analysis (Del Campo et al 2008 -241 Considering the selection of variables for the study, justification is also found in the inputs of numerous studies in the region, the EU and the world (Del Campo et al 2008, Palevičienė and Dumčiuvienė 2015, Bartkowska and Riedl 2012, Cruz-Jesus et al 2012, Melecky 2012, Kurnoga-Živadinović 2007, Rovan and Sambt 2003, Rašić-Bakarić 2005, Aragon el al. 2003, Gonzalez and Morini 2000, Peschel 1998, Pettersson 2001, Kronthaler 2003, Ru'a Vieytes et al 2003, Stimson et al 2001-socio-economic indicators, Soares et al 2003-demographic, economic, health, educational and cultural characteristics, Lovrinčević et al 2005, Pejanović and Kordej De-Villa 2015-economic, demographic and social characteristics, Botrić et al 2006-development of road structure construction, Botrić et al 2003-wages, employment, unemployment, labor mobility, Bloom et al 2001, Feyrer 2002, Gómez and Hernández de Cos 2006, Hartmann 2010, Balan 2015, Kelley 2001, De Haas 2008.…”
Section: The Regionalization Based On Socioeconomic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to this paper, some of the previous studies conducted their research of regional inequalities and classification of local communities based on combination of factor and cluster analysis (Del Campo et al 2008 -241 Considering the selection of variables for the study, justification is also found in the inputs of numerous studies in the region, the EU and the world (Del Campo et al 2008, Palevičienė and Dumčiuvienė 2015, Bartkowska and Riedl 2012, Cruz-Jesus et al 2012, Melecky 2012, Kurnoga-Živadinović 2007, Rovan and Sambt 2003, Rašić-Bakarić 2005, Aragon el al. 2003, Gonzalez and Morini 2000, Peschel 1998, Pettersson 2001, Kronthaler 2003, Ru'a Vieytes et al 2003, Stimson et al 2001-socio-economic indicators, Soares et al 2003-demographic, economic, health, educational and cultural characteristics, Lovrinčević et al 2005, Pejanović and Kordej De-Villa 2015-economic, demographic and social characteristics, Botrić et al 2006-development of road structure construction, Botrić et al 2003-wages, employment, unemployment, labor mobility, Bloom et al 2001, Feyrer 2002, Gómez and Hernández de Cos 2006, Hartmann 2010, Balan 2015, Kelley 2001, De Haas 2008.…”
Section: The Regionalization Based On Socioeconomic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). With a surface of 1823 km 2 (CBS, 2015) and composite development index of 32.8% of the national average (Pejnović and Kordej-De Villa, 2015), it is one of the smallest and the most underdeveloped Croatian counties.…”
Section: Research Area and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Croatian War of Independence and the collapse of socialism in the 1990's caused massive socio-economic and institutional changes (Lukić, 2012). The period of transition to a market economy was characterised by economic crisis, depopulation, unsuccessful privatisation, and deterioration of the sectoral structure (Pejnović and Kordej-De Villa, 2015). The aforementioned conditions and processes influenced land abandonment and afforestation (Cvitanović et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Borderlands research in Southeast Europe (e.g., in Serbia and Croatia) has applied a range of methodological approaches to confirm the hypothesis of border regions as economically, socially and demographically marginalized parts of the national territory (Popović and Radeljak 2011;Zorko 2012;Pejnović and Kordej-De Villa 2015;Vukmirović et al 2016). In comparing the socio-economic indicators of border regions with the national average and examining the standard of living in these areas (Máliková et al 2015;Đerčan et al 2016), determining the incidence of demographic issues (Zupanc 2018;Anđelković-Stoilković 2019) and analyzing borderlands in the context of national security (Vukmirović et al 2016), multiple authors have concluded that border regions are observed through the paradigm of spatial polarization due to the disparity in the levels of development between the center and periphery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%