Dimensions and Morphology of the Cornea in Three Strains of Mice

Abstract

Purpose To use a histologic approach to obtain dimensional and morphologic information on the cornea in three commonly used strains of mice. Methods Adult mice (three each of 129/SVJ, C57BL/6, and BALB/c) were euthanatized, and the eyes were enucleated, immersed in 2% glutaraldehyde fixative, and prepared for light and transmission electron microscopy. The full corneal, epithelial, stromal, and posterior limiting lamina (PLL) with endothelium thicknesses were measured at the same location centrally and peripherally. Results All three strains showed a statistically significant (P0.001) decrease in overall thickness in the peripheral compared with the central cornea. The decrease was due to a reduced thickness of both the epithelium and the stroma. The stroma and epithelium contributed to approximately two thirds and one third of the total corneal thickness, respectively. The epithelium had the classic stratified layout and consisted of 13.00 ± 1.41 layers centrally versus 10.33 ± 1.37 peripherally. Some adaptation of stromal tissue was found immediately adjacent to the epithelial basement membrane, but a clearly defined anterior limiting lamina did not exist. The stroma was organized into lamellae but lacked the anterior branching and interweaving reported in humans and had unmyelinated nerve fibers within micrometers of the endothelium. The PLL was 2.17 ± 0.3 μm thick and was divided into pre- and postnatal layers, with striated bodies in the postnatal portion. Conclusions This study demonstrated that in the three strains of mice examined, the cornea becomes significantly thinner toward the periphery. Dimensionally, proportionally, and anatomically the three strains used appeared to be similar. However, morphologic differences were observed compared with other mammals, and awareness of these differences is important when using the mouse as an animal model applicable to the human.

Quantitative Assessment of Ultrastructure and Light Scatter in Mouse Corneal Debridement Wounds

“…Unlike the primate, the mouse does not possess an anterior limiting lamina, and this makes the epithelial relationship to underlying tissue fundamentally different between mice and humans. 45,46 Herein lies a limitation of the mouse model. Nevertheless, the other advantages of using mice as models for human pathology, such as the ability to manipulate the mouse genome, make it a valuable model for the study of corneal scar formation and resolution.…”

Pattern recognition receptors in microbial keratitis

“…184 Rabbits possess a nictitating membrane, and the structure of a human cornea is different in several ways to that of mice and rabbits: Bowman's layer and Descemet's membrane are thicker, 185 the orientation of the collagen is different 186 and the depth of each of the layers varies depending on species. 187 On a molecular level, examples of species differences include the fact that mice are known to use several NAIP accessory proteins to activate the NLRP4 inflammasome, whereas in humans only one type of NAIP has been found. 59,188 Caspase-11 is known to be present in mice, but its analogue in humans is caspase-4.…”

A microscale optical implant for continuous in vivo monitoring of intraocular pressure

“…The implant's inductive coils occupy most of this space; a larger coil is required to achieve a longer readout distance and better accuracy 52,59 . For ophthalmic implants, sensor miniaturization is important because the space available for an ocular implant is very small, especially in research animals (e.g., mice) with corneal diameters of approximately 3 mm 60,61 . Some of the RF-based IOP sensors were miniaturized down to the millimeter scale, but their practical use has been limited by short readout distances or the need for sophisticated measurement equipment (for example, spectrum, vector-network analyser) for readout 62,63 .…”