2013
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.662.562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-Edge Triggered T Flip-Flop Structure Using Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata

Abstract: As an emerging nanotechnology, quantum-dot cellular automata (QCA) has the potential to be used for next generation VLSI. Various designs of combinational logic circuits have been proposed for QCA implementation, but sequential circuit design is limited due to the lack of high-performance QCA flip-flops. After an introduction on QCA and dual-edge triggered (DET) flip-flops, a new QCA DET T flip-flop following a pulsed latch scheme is presented. The proposed T flip-flop is simulated using QCADesigner simulator … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed LST-FFs require three fixed inputs, and the proposed NET-FFs require four fixed inputs. Xiao et al [35] implemented a dual-edge triggered T flip-flop. Compared with [35], the proposed NET-FFs have a smaller cell count, smaller area, lower latency, and lower power consumption.…”
Section: Previous Clock Current Clock Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed LST-FFs require three fixed inputs, and the proposed NET-FFs require four fixed inputs. Xiao et al [35] implemented a dual-edge triggered T flip-flop. Compared with [35], the proposed NET-FFs have a smaller cell count, smaller area, lower latency, and lower power consumption.…”
Section: Previous Clock Current Clock Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xiao et al [35] implemented a dual-edge triggered T flip-flop. Compared with [35], the proposed NET-FFs have a smaller cell count, smaller area, lower latency, and lower power consumption. The area of the proposed NET-FF1 is smaller than that of the Table 5 shows the comparisons of the performance and energy consumption of the existing designs of LST-FFs and NET-FFs.…”
Section: Previous Clock Current Clock Outputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell counts Area (µm 2 ) Latency [24] 184 0.32 3 [25] 108 0.20 1.5 [21] 92 0.10 1.25 [26] 81 0.07 1.5 [22] 66 0.06 1.25 [27] 55 0.06 1.5 [10] 46 0.06 1 Proposed 21 0.0186 0.5…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%