2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2006
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2006.282468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamical Systems Approach for the Autonomous Avoidance of Obstacles and Joint-limits for an Redundant Robot Arm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this simulated scenario, the user grasps the tip, moves it far away from the task region (with a non-negligible effort, since a motion command is always present). The learned skill is reproduced in 3 See [18] for further details and proof of closed loop stability. 4 The number of components is set empirically, by visual inspection, in order to reach a good trade-off between the model complexity and fit of the data.…”
Section: B Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this simulated scenario, the user grasps the tip, moves it far away from the task region (with a non-negligible effort, since a motion command is always present). The learned skill is reproduced in 3 See [18] for further details and proof of closed loop stability. 4 The number of components is set empirically, by visual inspection, in order to reach a good trade-off between the model complexity and fit of the data.…”
Section: B Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several rescaling techniques have been proposed to modulate the contribution of each subsystem to the overall robot motion. Usually the contribution of each motion primitive is suitably modulated in order to adapt the motion to goal variations and collision avoidance [2], along with suppression of unwanted movements in the null space [4] or avoidance of joint limits reaching [3].…”
Section: Related Work and Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both problems get even more complex when the environment changes over time (e.g., there are moving targets or obstacles). In such cases, rather than solving the inverse problems analytically, various heuristic approaches are being used [5,7], such as roadmaps [2,17], cell decomposition [20], potential fields [18], or other dynamical systems approaches [16]. Hayashi [15] presents a method in which the joint angles are represented by a continuous function of time and the joint index, generating smooth movement plans.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was applied in a reaching task for controlling a humanoid's reaching motion, where the robot performed smooth motion while avoiding configurations near the joint limits. In a reaching while avoiding an obstacle task, Iossifidis & Schöner (2006) used attractor dynamics, where the target object acts as a point attractor on the end effctor. Both the end-effector and the redundant elbow joint avoided the obstacle as the arm reaches for an object.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the end-effector and the redundant elbow joint avoided the obstacle as the arm reaches for an object. The way to combine the demonstrated path with the robots own plan distinguishes our use of the NSP from from previous work (Hersch & Billard, 2008), (Ijspeert et al, 2002) and (Iossifidis & Schöner, 2006). Another difference is the use of the hand state space for PbD; most approaches for motion planning in the literature uses joint space (Ijspeert et al, 2002) while some other approaches use the Cartesian space.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%