Economics of Tobacco Control in China 2016
DOI: 10.1142/9789813108721_0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Costs Attributable to Smoking in China: Update and an 8-year Comparison, 2000–2008

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of our findings with those of other investigations that estimated costs for the health system is limited, due to aspects that were mentioned in a previous research 44 . It is possible, however, to state that many studies lead to similar results by providing evidence the high economic burden of smoking for countries 45,46,47 . One of the parameters to measure this magnitude is the GDP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The comparison of our findings with those of other investigations that estimated costs for the health system is limited, due to aspects that were mentioned in a previous research 44 . It is possible, however, to state that many studies lead to similar results by providing evidence the high economic burden of smoking for countries 45,46,47 . One of the parameters to measure this magnitude is the GDP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…One of the parameters to measure this magnitude is the GDP. In China, the economic impact of smoking represented 0.7% of the GDP in 2008 47 . Our results indicate that in Brazil this impact was 0.5% of the GDP in 2011.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of SHS costs to active smoking costs in our study was higher than a study conducted in Hong Kong, which reported a ratio of 29%. 25 Our study demonstrates that the true impact of smoking on healthcare costs in rural areas would be one third higher than the estimates by Yang et al 24 when the burden of SHS exposure is included. Given that the majority of women and children are nonsmokers and exposed to SHS in rural China, tobacco control interventions that reduce SHS exposure are needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…24 Converting these estimates into 2011 dollars using the Consumer Price Index (105.9 in 2008 and 105.4 in 2011), 17 the healthcare cost of active smoking for rural China would be $3.38 billion. Therefore, our estimated healthcare cost attributable to SHS exposure was more than one-third of the cost of active smoking in rural areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study published in 2011 reported the total economic cost of smoking in China to be nearly $30 billion and rising, including $22.7 billion in indirect costs (19). Another large-scale study in southwest China reported smoking to be responsible for costs of $95.5 million, including $94.7 million in direct costs, of which over $25 million were associated with COPD (20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%