Elimination of viruses and hypersensitivity to potato virus Y (PVYo) in an important sudanese potato stock (Zalinge)

El-Amin, S. M.; Valkonen, Jari P. T.; Bremer, Kåre; Pehu, Eija

doi:10.1007/bf02849292

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Meristem tip culture Banana bunchy top virus (BBTV) 57.14 [34] Banana mosaic virus (BMV) 64.28 [34] Leek yellow stripe virus (LYSV-G) 100 [35] Onion yellow dwarf virus (OYDV-G) 92 [35] Garlic common latent virus (GCLV) 62 [35] Onion mite-borne latent virus (OMbLV-G) <54 [35] Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) 92.5 [36] Grapevine leafroll associated virus -1 (GLRaV-1) 95 [36] Peanut stripe virus (PStV) >88. 89 [21] Piper yellow mottle virus (PYMoV) 84 [22] Chemotherapy Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV) 94 [37] Grapevine leafroll-associated virus-1 (GLRaV-1) 72 [28] Grapevine leafroll-associated virus-3 (GLRaV-3) 78 [28] Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus (GRSPaV) 85.7 [29] Cryotherapy Plum pox virus (PPV) 50 [38] Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) 30 [39] Banana streak virus (BSV) 90 [39] Grapevine virus A 97 [40] Strawberry mild yellow edge virus (SMYEV) 95 [41] Potato leafroll virus (PLRV) 83-86 [42] Potato virus Y (PVY) 91-95 [42] Yam mosaic virus (YMV) 90 [43] Cryotherapy + meristem tip culture Thermotherapy Chrysanthemum stunt viroid (CSVd) 100 [44] Potato Leaf Roll Virus (PLRV) 45 [45] Potato Virus S (PVS) 50 [45] Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 1 (GLRaV-1) 91.2 [46] Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus (GRSPaV) 67.6 [46] Banana bunchy top virus 62.5 [47] Thermotherapy + cryotherapy Onion Yellow Dwarf virus (OYDV) 90 [48] Leek Yellow Strip virus (LYSV) 100 [48] Garlic Common Latent virus (GCLV) 80 [48] Raspberry bushy dwarf virus (RBDV) 35 [49] Thermotherapy + meristem tip culture Plum pox virus (PPV) 86 [50] Prunus necrotic ringspot virus (PNRSV) 81 …”

Section: Name Of Viruses Eliminated Success Rate (%) Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of conventional and advanced approaches for the control of plant viruses

2019

Jabb

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Viruses are the obligatory intracellular parasites infecting microbes, plants, animals, and humans. They are dead outside host cell but can take-over the host's cell machinery as soon as they are into it. Several studies on inhibitor compounds have been done for animal viruses including those that are affecting humans, but there is inadequacy in terms of research and literature for plant viruses that are responsible for losses in crop yield and quality loss all across the globe. This could be focal point to study plant viruses, their transmission and pathogenicity, and to establish widely used, effective, and advanced approaches for their control. The purpose of this review is to discuss various approaches to control plant viruses that have been developed and applied to combat plant viral infections. We have divided these approaches into two categories conventional (meristemtip culture, cryotherapy, thermotherapy, and chemotherapy) and advanced (nucleic acid-based approaches like RNA Silencing, cross-protection, transgenic plants, gene pyramiding, and protein-protein interaction). Moreover, we have discussed and compared the principles, methodologies, advantages, and disadvantages of each technique. The approaches have been explored to promote their application in best suited way on various plants to control viral diseases and to improve food crops quality with increase in production.

show abstract

Section: Name Of Viruses Eliminated Success Rate (%) Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of conventional and advanced approaches for the control of plant viruses

2019

Jabb

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thermotherapy reduced the incidence of PLRV (Potato Leaf Roll Virus) and PVS (Potato Virus S) by 45% and 50%, respectively (El-Amin et at., 1994). More virusfree plants were obtained when heat treatments were included (Zapata et al, 1995).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%