“…Our proposal, compared to the balanced 90° downconverter (based on a 2x4 MMI), not only showed the same noise-induced penalty under ideal hardware, but exhibited a higher signal dynamic range, wider operating bandwidth and greater tolerance to fabrication errors for a single-channel reception. In this paper we compare the performance of colorless reception of 56 Gbps QAM WDM channels (enabling 112 Gbps under dual polarization), for two different types of monolithically integrated downconverters: the conventional 90°, based in a 2x4 MMI and differential transimpedance amplifiers, and the 120°, based on a 2x3 MMI [7,10] with calibrated analog in-phase and quadrature (IQ) recovery. Simulation results show that hardware imbalances arising from typical fabrication errors reduce the CMRR and increase the interference from coincident channels in a much more limiting way for the monolithic integrated conventional 90° downconverter than for the calibrated 120° downconverter.…”