2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of artificial neural network algorithms for predicting the effect of the urine flow rate on the power performance of microbial fuel cells

Abstract: Microbial fuel cell (MFC) power performance strongly depends on the biofilm growth, which in turn is affected by the feed flow rate. In this work, an artificial neural network (ANN) approach has been used to simulate the effect of the flow rate on the power output by ceramic MFCs fed with neat human urine. To this aim, three different second-order algorithms were used to train our network and then compared in terms of prediction accuracy and convergence time: Quasi-Newton, Levenberg-Marquardt, and Conjugate Gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model data statistics and their bootstrap 95% confidence intervals in square brackets [dissolved oxygen: DO; conductivity: Cond. ; chemical oxygen demand: COD; total suspended solids: TSS; total organic carbon: TOC; ammonium: NH data is lower than some ANN models in the literature (R 2 : 0.96 [52], R 2 : 0.95 [53] and R 2 : 0.99 [54]). The higher accuracy reported by these models is likely caused by the models being developed from data that was collected under laboratory conditions, therefore, not subject to the same degree of variability exhibited by the data collected from the H 2 AD plant.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 59%
“…The model data statistics and their bootstrap 95% confidence intervals in square brackets [dissolved oxygen: DO; conductivity: Cond. ; chemical oxygen demand: COD; total suspended solids: TSS; total organic carbon: TOC; ammonium: NH data is lower than some ANN models in the literature (R 2 : 0.96 [52], R 2 : 0.95 [53] and R 2 : 0.99 [54]). The higher accuracy reported by these models is likely caused by the models being developed from data that was collected under laboratory conditions, therefore, not subject to the same degree of variability exhibited by the data collected from the H 2 AD plant.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 59%
“…The general output and error function of ANN can be expressed in Eqs. ( 3 ) and ( 4 ) (de Ramón-Fernández et al 2020 ). where, X i and W ij represent the input data and a weight value, respectively, f () gives the activation function, and y i and D i are the net output and the estimated output value, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general output and error function of ANN can be expressed in Eqs. ( 3) and ( 4) (de Ramón-Fernández et al 2020).…”
Section: Phase 1: Pearson Correlation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stage 2 involved the error testing of predicted results. e algorithm evaluated the prediction effect using the RMSE, MSE, and coefficients of autocorrelated errors [59][60][61]. If the error in prediction was within the acceptable range, the predicted results of the data used as inputs for the next stage of storage space allocation.…”
Section: Steps Of the Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%