2002
DOI: 10.1080/00207170210140212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended H 2 and H norm characterizations and controller parametrizations for discrete-time systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
450
0
17

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 677 publications
(470 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
450
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…This is just a sample of possible problems and many more can be considered, such as robust or state feedback synthesis (see e.g., [2]), linear parameter-varying (LPV) design (see, e.g., [5] for a formulation of the LPV synthesis problem in the form of a robust convex semidefinite program, and [24] for a randomized solution approach, alternative to the one proposed in this paper), LP-based robust pole assignment (see [32]), the various robust design problems based on parameter-dependent linear matrix inequalities presented in [1], as well as problems in the robust model predictive control setup. For discrete-time systems, the robust analysis and design criteria proposed in [21] and [22] are also directly suitable for the scenario technique. Also, problems of set-membership state reachability and filtering [14], [18] may be efficiently solved in a probabilistic sense by the proposed methodology.…”
Section: Other Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is just a sample of possible problems and many more can be considered, such as robust or state feedback synthesis (see e.g., [2]), linear parameter-varying (LPV) design (see, e.g., [5] for a formulation of the LPV synthesis problem in the form of a robust convex semidefinite program, and [24] for a randomized solution approach, alternative to the one proposed in this paper), LP-based robust pole assignment (see [32]), the various robust design problems based on parameter-dependent linear matrix inequalities presented in [1], as well as problems in the robust model predictive control setup. For discrete-time systems, the robust analysis and design criteria proposed in [21] and [22] are also directly suitable for the scenario technique. Also, problems of set-membership state reachability and filtering [14], [18] may be efficiently solved in a probabilistic sense by the proposed methodology.…”
Section: Other Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it is noted that the aforementioned research efforts have been focused on the use of a single quadratic Lyapunov function (de Oliveira et al 2002;Haddad and Bernstein 1995), which tends to yield more conservative conditions. More recently, there appeared a number of results on stability analysis and control synthesis of 1-D dynamic systems based on basis-dependent Lyapunov functions (Choi and Park 2003;Gao et al 2009;Guerra and Vermeiren 2004;Zhou et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the regional pole placement case, the H 2 and H ∞ control problems have been the subject of recent research, e.g. [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polytopic representation is one of the most used approaches for describing uncertainty or variability of the parameters in linear parameter-varying (LPV) systems. Looking at [2,5,19,7,21,8,12,13], it can be seen that a lot of effort has been put in developing techniques for regional pole placement and H 2 /H ∞ control of polytopic systems, taking advantage of some useful properties of LMIs that allow to assure that their satisfaction at some points, i.e. the vertices of the polytope, implies their satisfaction in all points inside the polytope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%