Frege’s Puzzle Is Here to Stay: Triviality and Informativity in Natural Languages

Abstract

Frege's puzzling remarks on the beginning of On Sense and Reference challenge us to explain how true identity sentences of the form a = a can differ in cognitive value from sentences of the form a = b when they are made true by the same object's selfidentity. Some philosophers (e.g. Almog, Glezakos and Paganini) suggest that the puzzle cannot be set up in the context of natural

Pengaruh Media Puzzle Education Game terhadap Perkembangan Kognitif dan Bahasa Anak TK

“…Hal ini sejalan dengan penelitian Trimantara & Mulya, (2019) menyimpulkan bahwa perkembangan bahasa anak dapat dikembangkan melalui permainan edukatif yang berupa Puzzle. Menurut penelitian (Valente & Boccardi, 2020) dalam jurnalnya menyatakan "a notion of coordination between name which is apt to track the relevant logical properties of natural sentences and therefore to set up the Puzzle in natural languages". Artinya pengaturan bahasa yang tepat dalam Puzzle bisa digunakan untuk mengetahui sifat benda secara logis.…”

Como ler o primeiro parágrafo de “Sobre o sentido e a referência”

“…Há diversas interpretações disponíveis a respeito das questões cruciais envolvidas no problema original (e.g. Salmon (1986); Salmon (1992); Mendelsohn (2005); Dickie (2008); Caplan & Thau (2001); Valente & Boccardi (2020)). Especialmente problemática, contudo, é a interpretação de Glezakos (2009).…”