Untitled

Bilan, Yuriy; Raišienė, Agota Giedrė; Vasilyeva, Tetyana; Lyulyov, Oleksii; Pimonenko, Tetyana

doi:10.13165/vpa-19-18-2-05

Cited by 31 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This cluster could be called «public administration». http://mmi.fem.sumdu.edu.ua/en The findings proved that scientific community around the world analysed the public administration and innovations from the different points of views: social and economic development of the national economy (Bilan et al, 2019e;Vasylieva et al, 2017bVasylieva et al, , 2013;Dalevska et al, 2019;); the influence of bank and financial system on innovation development (Bilan et al, 2019a;Buriak et al, 2015;Vasylieva et al, 2017a;Bilan et al, 2019d;Kaźmierczyk and Chinalska, 2018;Tkachenko et al, 2019b;Brychko et al, 2018); country's brand management (Bilan et al, 2019b); macroeconomic stability (Bilan et al, 2019c;Dementyev and Scherbakov, 2017); green innovations and energy policy (Yevdokimov et al, 2018;Pimonenko et al, 2017;Chygryn et al, 2019;Pająk et al, 2017); new management trends .…”

Section: Figure 1 Publication Activity In Scopus On Innovations and mentioning

confidence: 83%

Innovation Development of Public Administration: Management and Legislation Features

Кондратенко¹,

Okopnyk²,

Ziganto

et al. 2020

MMI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper deals with the analysis of the impact of public administration on the innovation development. With purposes to identify the main scientific directions of analysis among the scientific community, the authors did the bibliometric study. For the reviews, the authors selected 1167 papers which indexing in Scopus. For the visualising the findings of bibliometric analysis, the VOSviewer was used. The results allow allocating 10 clusters of scientific directions which analysed the issues of innovations and public administrations. The first most significant clusters could «innovation» analysed the efficiency of the public administration through the effectiveness of innovation implementation. The second clusters connected with the government innovation policy and located close to the first clusters. The third cluster «public administration» involved 40 items and 4699 links. The scientists with Italian and American affiliations had the most significant shares of papers. At the same time, the European funding allocated the most significant share of financing such research. The hypothesis of the investigation was checking the linking between levels of innovation development and countries’ rating on the efficiency of public administration using the correlation analysis and least square model. For the checking hypothesis, the authors used the software EViews11. The authors analysed the Worldwide Governance Indicators as the base indicators for the assessment of public administration efficiency. For the analysis, the authors used data for EU countries and Ukraine. As Ukraine has started the integration process, the Ukrainian policy should be synchronised with the EU. The findings proved the correlation between variables. Thus, the increasing of government efficiency and the rule of law lead to increasing by 0,094 and 0,043 points the level of innovation development of the country corresponding. At the same time, the increasing regulation policy provoke the increase of innovation development by 0,08 points. The less impact had the variables as follows: sustainability competitiveness of the country and volume of expenditure on research and development. After analysis of the empirical data, the reviews of the management and legal instruments was done. Considering the EU experience, the authors identified the system of tools which lead to increasing of public administration efficiency as follows: legislation on property rights, anti-corruption directives, digitalisation of government authorities at all levels. For the future investigation, the time and range of the countries should be extended. Keywords governance, management, law, property right, innovation.

show abstract

Section: Figure 1 Publication Activity In Scopus On Innovations and mentioning

confidence: 83%

Innovation Development of Public Administration: Management and Legislation Features

Кондратенко¹,

Okopnyk²,

Ziganto

et al. 2020

MMI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some of them are correlated with each other. Thus, Bilan et al (2019) proposed the approach to integrate WGI index based on the Fishburne's method, considering the impact's power and direction of the different subindexes WGI on FDI inflow and eliminating the issue of multicollinearity. To calculate, it is suggested to use the formula:…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Institutional Quality and Shadow Economy: An Investment Potential Evaluation Model

Lyulyov¹,

Moskalenko²

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article summarizes some arguments as regards the scientific challenge on improving approaches to evaluating the country’s investment potential. The main objective of the research is to identify the features and perspectives of applying the variables such as the shadow economy and the integrated institutional quality index into a model evaluating the country’s investment potential. To solve this task, systematization of the related theoretical and methodological materials has been done. The methodological tools of the research are carried out in the following logical sequence: systematization of existing statistical methods for estimating the shadow economy; time data series analysis; and regression analysis. The scope of the shadow economy could be estimated as a dependent variable, with both its determinants and indicators detected and measured. The macro methods, such as Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) are suitable approaches from an econometric standpoint to evaluate the shadow economy. Institutional quality is crucially an important variable for empirical studies related to evaluating the country’s investment potential. The proposed approach considers significance and direction of the six Worldwide Government Indicators’ (WGI) impact on foreign direct investment net inflow, eliminating the issue of their multicollinearity. However, political instability and high frequency of foreign and domestic policy changes during the last decades distort statistical significance of the results obtained. FDI inflow, as well as the quality of governance, and the shadow economy, is influenced by many other factors, both internal and external, so to build a qualitative model for evaluating the country’s investment potential of the national economy it is necessary to expand the set of factors for analysis. The results of the research can be useful for a more accurate investment potential evaluation on the macroeconomic level, and forecasting foreign direct investment inflows for the following time periods.

show abstract

“…The results of the generalisation of scientific research showed that researchers analysed a different set of factors influencing the transformation processes of the transition to a climate-free economy. Thus, scientists have identified social (Palienko et al, 2017;, ecological Mačaitytė et al, 2018); Matsenko et al, 2017), economic (Bhowmik, 2019;Bilan et al, 2019) determinants of the impact on macroeconomic stability in reforming the energy sector in the direction of carbon neutrality.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Energy Efficiency Of National Economy: Social, Economic And Ecological Indicators

Ziabina

Pimonenko

Starchenko

2020

SEC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper aimed to formalise the relationship between the level of Ukrainian energy efficiency from 30 indicators of social, ecological and economic development of the country. The main purpose of the study is to identify the impact and dependence of socio-ecological and economic indicators on the level of energy efficiency using multiple correlation-regression analysis. The systematisation of the analysed results allowed identifying the core directions to overcome the issues of the slow pace of energy efficiency improvement and the development of carbon neutrality of the country. The relevance of this scientific solution to the problem is that the level of energy efficiency is influenced by a large number of socio-ecological and economic factors sometimes independent of each other. The authors analysed the relationship between the level of energy efficiency and socio-ecological and economic indicators of country development. The investigation consisted from the following stages: conducting polynomial-regression analysis of energy efficiency development in Ukraine; development of correlation-regression multiple models of relationships between energy efficiency indicator and socio-ecological-economic indicators; explaining the conclusions and providing recommendations considering the findings. The object of the study was the processes of energy efficiency relationships with 30 indicators of socio-ecological and economic development, namely how much they affect the energy development of the country. The conclusions were theoretical and practical in terms of the impact on the level of energy efficiency of interdisciplinary indicators. The conclusions which proved by the empirical findings allowed identifying weaknesses in the development of the national economy, as well as to improve and increase the energy potential of the country through energy efficiency development strategies due to the studied determinants that have a strong impact on the level of energy efficiency. Keywords: energy efficiency, carbon-free economy, sustainable development, energy sector, green energy, energy security.

show abstract

Untitled

Cited by 31 publications

References 16 publications

Innovation Development of Public Administration: Management and Legislation Features

Innovation Development of Public Administration: Management and Legislation Features

Institutional Quality and Shadow Economy: An Investment Potential Evaluation Model

Energy Efficiency Of National Economy: Social, Economic And Ecological Indicators

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About