Improving methods for evaluating the results of digitizing public corporations

Abstract

The list, nature, and directions in changing the business processes of public corporations due to digital transformation have been determined. The main digital technologies that are used by public corporations operating in the basic sectors of the national economy were grouped. It has been proven that one of the most important criteria for digital transformation is the level of information transparency. A morphological matrix of digital transformation of public corporations has been built and the positions of the latter in the process under study have been determined. Based on the results of the matrix assessment, it was concluded that the most attention is attracted by the digitalization processes in corporations-outsiders. This is because this position is characterized by a high level of digital maturity but a low level of transparency. To ensure a high level of transparency, it seems appropriate for these companies to introduce new digital technologies. This paper analyzes those endogenous and exogenous factors that promote or block the process of introducing digital technologies in public corporations. It was found that at the level of public corporations, there are significant resource constraints, which are manifested in the lack of funds for the introduction of digital technologies. Another significant obstacle is the psychological barriers associated with the unwillingness to use digital technologies in the work process. The generalization of the efficiency indicators of business processes and criteria for factor conditions of digital transformation has made it possible to identify the main components of the system model of digitalization of public corporations. Considering the above, an authentic system model of digitalization of the public corporate sector is proposed. It seems appropriate to use the model to determine the effect of the introduction of digital technologies in the public corporate sector.

Development of a system for statistical measurement of the influence of digital technologies on the efficiency of management

“…The analysis of methodological approaches to statistical measurement of the level of development of digital technologies showed the absence of a unified approach. At the same time, experts [19,42] compile various ratings of digitalization of the economy of different levels -international, state, regional, sectoral. The basis of each methodical approach contains a holistic system of sub-indexes, based on which the integrated indicator of the development of digital technologies is calculated, as well as directions and steps for further digitalization are determined [19].…”

“…At the same time, experts [19,42] compile various ratings of digitalization of the economy of different levels -international, state, regional, sectoral. The basis of each methodical approach contains a holistic system of sub-indexes, based on which the integrated indicator of the development of digital technologies is calculated, as well as directions and steps for further digitalization are determined [19]. However, the specific variety of methodological approaches at the level of organizations requires their systematic generalization and the choice of the most acceptable option for specific conditions of economic activity.…”

“…Work [19] develops a model of digitalization of the state corporate sector, which contains the relationships between factors and indicators of the effectiveness of business process management.…”

“…The results of our in-depth review [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] prove that the lion's share of scientific research considers the impact of digitalization and the development of digital technologies on operational and financial activities. At the same time, statistical methods of evaluation are used to measure the impact.…”

Elaboration of recommendations on the development of the state internal audit system when applying the digital technologies

“…Note: compiled according to [28][29][30][31][32][33][34] Fig. influenced by threats from internal and external factors, as well as risks.…”