2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons learned from Brazilian natural gas industry reform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, onshore natural gas potential production faces challenges related to the expansion of the gas transportation grid, given its high upfront costs and the monopolistic nature of the Brazilian market (Camargo et al, 2014;Mathias and Szklo, 2007). On the other hand, transporting the production of offshore pre-salt associated gas to consumer centers is costly, given the far distance from the coast (round 300 km).…”
Section: Oil and Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, onshore natural gas potential production faces challenges related to the expansion of the gas transportation grid, given its high upfront costs and the monopolistic nature of the Brazilian market (Camargo et al, 2014;Mathias and Szklo, 2007). On the other hand, transporting the production of offshore pre-salt associated gas to consumer centers is costly, given the far distance from the coast (round 300 km).…”
Section: Oil and Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the first wave of reform failed to induce openness in the gas industry, the literature emphasized the need to reformulate the regulation of the sector, ensure non-discriminatory access to the transport network and promote changes to encourage infrastructure expansion. While some proposals defended the maintenance of the authorization regime for the exploration of the transport activity (Ana et al, 2009), others supported a change to the concession regime (Mathias & Szklo, 2007). The second wave of reforms started from the consensus that light-handed regulation was not sufficient to deal with the monopolistic presence of Petrobras in the entire industry (Cordeiro et al, 2012); however, it resulted in an overly centralized and complex coordination for access and expansion of the infrastructure (Ferraro & Hallack, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, this methodology was mostly applied to agricultural commodities' markets, with few applications to energy markets. Therefore, by applying this methodology to the European gas market we argue that this can be used in energy markets to evaluate transaction costs and asymmetric price responses, providing case studies for other markets that plan to go through liberalization processes, like the Brazilian market (Mathias and Szklo, 2007) or the Chinese market (Ishwaran et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%