2017 13th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing (ICCP) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iccp.2017.8116997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Machine learning for sensor-based manufacturing processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While examining several related works that perform classification on the SECOM data set via a pipeline of preprocessing stages, it can be seen that many choose to apply some or all the preprocessing on the data before splitting the data into training and test data sets. In [3][4][5], the task of feature selection was applied before cross-validation, and in [1,2,6,11] this task was applied before isolating one third of the data instances into the test set.…”
Section: Cross-validation and The Proper Way To Do Itmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While examining several related works that perform classification on the SECOM data set via a pipeline of preprocessing stages, it can be seen that many choose to apply some or all the preprocessing on the data before splitting the data into training and test data sets. In [3][4][5], the task of feature selection was applied before cross-validation, and in [1,2,6,11] this task was applied before isolating one third of the data instances into the test set.…”
Section: Cross-validation and The Proper Way To Do Itmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This balance can be created either by oversampling the minority distribution-in our case the failures-or by under-sampling the majority distribution-i.e., the successes. Since oversampling has been shown to outperform under-sampling [3], we use oversampling in this work. The approach used in this work is Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) [19].…”
Section: Synthetic Data Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many studies to build the failure prediction model using feature selection, most of which have selected features considering the importance of each feature [20][21][22]. Moldovan et al built a failure prediction model using the selected features to improve prediction accuracy and performed feature selection using three algorithms (i.e., random forest, regression analysis, and orthogonal linear transformation) to compare the prediction accuracy of each for the comparative study [20]. Mahadevan and Shah used a support vector machine recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) algorithm to rank the features by their importance [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Review of relevant literature: The data in modern manufacturing challenges can suffer from high dimensionality, complexity, non-linearity and inconsistencies [1][2][3][4]. To address these challenges, machine learning and data analytics methods have been employed [2][3][4][5], which concentrate on predictive maintenance and rare event prediction [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Susto et al [3] presented a new multiple classifier model for predictive maintenance along with a simulation study and benchmark dataset; the data needed to be pre-processed in order to allow for a suitable classifier such as k-NN and support vector machines (SVM), to be trained. In [5], different ML methods were compared for a semiconductor manufacturing dataset and highlighted the benefits of reducing the data through feature selection. Work in [7] emphasised the benefits of AI and ML for manufacturing, but there has been little investigation into the statistical basis of data preprocessing to improve model performance and learning procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%