2005
DOI: 10.1063/1.1996827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Magneto-optical additivity in ferromagnetic bilayers separated by nonferromagnetic spacers

Abstract: We show that for some ultrathin multilayer structures the proportionality of the longitudinal Kerr ellipticity signal to the magnetic film thickness does not take place. Instead, thinner magnetic layers give even twice larger contributions than the thicker ones located a few monolayers deeper. This effect is demonstrated both experimentally and theoretically on ultrathin Fe∕Cr∕Fe sandwich systems prepared on GaAs(001) surfaces. Such a behavior is explained by a depth variation of phase relations between the op… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Separation of polar MO signal from films in different depths was presented by Ferré [6] and Hamrle et al [7], [8] in the case of Co films separated by Au spacer. The depth sensitivity of longitudinal Kerr effect in Fe/Cr/Fe structure was demonstrated by Nývlt [9]. The depth sensitivity of soft X-ray resonant MO Kerr effect was reported by Lee et al [10] and Kim et al [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Separation of polar MO signal from films in different depths was presented by Ferré [6] and Hamrle et al [7], [8] in the case of Co films separated by Au spacer. The depth sensitivity of longitudinal Kerr effect in Fe/Cr/Fe structure was demonstrated by Nývlt [9]. The depth sensitivity of soft X-ray resonant MO Kerr effect was reported by Lee et al [10] and Kim et al [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In contrast, on semiconducting substrates, e.g., GaAs, the Kerr angle of Fe is mainly real and the additivity holds for the rotation, but not for the ellipticity. 6 For thicker layers, the phase of the electromagnetic wave inside the Fe layer changes due to the real part of the perpendicular wave-vector component k Ќ and, therefore, gives rise to negative Kerr ellipticity contributions coming from Fe layers buried deeper than about 12 nm, where the slope changes sign. On the other hand, the imaginary part of the wave vector k Ќ leads to a decreasing intensity of the electromagnetic wave with increasing depth inside the film, which determines the information depth of about 40 nm, where the slope begins to asymptotically flatten.…”
Section: A Linear Mokementioning
confidence: 99%
“…5-is generally not valid. 6 Therefore, a general numerical treatment of the MOKE by solving Maxwell's equations and the standard boundary conditions is indispensable for the quantitative interpretation of the Kerr angle. A prerequisite for this calculation is the precise knowledge of the optical and magneto-optical material parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors demonstrated separation from hysteresis loops of different Co layers showing different coercivity. The depth sensitivity of longitudinal Kerr effect in Fe/Cr/Fe structure was demonstrated by Nývlt [31]. The depth sensitivity of soft x-ray resonant magneto-optical Kerr effect was reported by Lee et al [32] and Kim et al [33].…”
Section: Basis Of Mo Selectivity To Magnetic Nanostructuresmentioning
confidence: 79%