IEEE InternationalElectron Devices Meeting, 2005. IEDM Technical Digest.
DOI: 10.1109/iedm.2005.1609445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Material dependence of hydrogen diffusion: implications for NBTI degradation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
143
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
143
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also important to note that this large short-time degradation seen for HfO 2 is T independent, while HfSiO x shows clear T dependence. Such differences between HfO 2 and HfSiO x have been observed for a wide range of stress E OX and T , which cannot be captured by using conventional SMS [5] or conventional OTF (having t 0 of 1 ms) [2], [3] measurements, and hence, such differences between HfSiO x and HfO 2 stacks were never reported before. Reduction in measured degradation at higher t 0 (due to noncapture of I DLIN degradation at short stress time) is larger for HfO 2 as compared to HfSiO x , which is more prominent at shorter stress time, with stronger reduction seen when t 0 delay is increased from 1 μs to 1 ms (shown) than from 1 ms to 10 ms (not explicitly shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is also important to note that this large short-time degradation seen for HfO 2 is T independent, while HfSiO x shows clear T dependence. Such differences between HfO 2 and HfSiO x have been observed for a wide range of stress E OX and T , which cannot be captured by using conventional SMS [5] or conventional OTF (having t 0 of 1 ms) [2], [3] measurements, and hence, such differences between HfSiO x and HfO 2 stacks were never reported before. Reduction in measured degradation at higher t 0 (due to noncapture of I DLIN degradation at short stress time) is larger for HfO 2 as compared to HfSiO x , which is more prominent at shorter stress time, with stronger reduction seen when t 0 delay is increased from 1 μs to 1 ms (shown) than from 1 ms to 10 ms (not explicitly shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…4 shows (RHS) the measured power-law time exponent (n) during long-time stress as a function of stress T , which is obtained by the conventional MSM method at various delays [8], as well as OTF (t 0 = 1 ms) [7] and UF-OTF (t 0 = 1 μs) [5] methods. It is now well known that recovery during measurement delay causes an increase in n [1], [7], [8]. As longer time recovery shows strong T dependence due to the ΔV IT -dominated process, a larger delay time in MSM results in strong T dependence of n [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recovery of ΔV h and ΔV IT and the correlation of recovery phase to stress phase for different SiON processes are not yet established. Hence, there is an ongoing debate on the physical mechanism of recovery, particularly its dominance by ΔV h , ΔV IT , or the correlated combination of both ΔV h and ΔV IT [1], [8]- [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ΔV T was measured using a conventional on-the-fly (OTF) I DLIN technique [7]. Channel length and width are 1µm and 10µm respectively, for NBTI and 1/f measurements.…”
Section: Device and Measurement Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%