Smart Structures, Devices, and Systems II 2005
DOI: 10.1117/12.582047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling and simulation of a flat spring for use in an electromagnetic microgenerator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) Flexural beam can increase the length of the beam so that the magnet can get more deflection (Awaja et al 2005); (3) Compared to a diaphragm or a membrane (Shearwood and Yates 1997), planar spring with gaps between the beams can greatly decrease the air damping produced in the vibration of the magnet; (4) Circular angle at the corner of the beam can disperse the stress compared to right angle at the same place.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Vibration Energy Harvester's Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) Flexural beam can increase the length of the beam so that the magnet can get more deflection (Awaja et al 2005); (3) Compared to a diaphragm or a membrane (Shearwood and Yates 1997), planar spring with gaps between the beams can greatly decrease the air damping produced in the vibration of the magnet; (4) Circular angle at the corner of the beam can disperse the stress compared to right angle at the same place.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Vibration Energy Harvester's Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NdFeB permanent magnet is selected due to its very high magnetic energy product. An electroplated copper spring other than silicon spring (Kulkarni et al 2007;Pan et al 2006;Awaja et al 2005) is used as the resonant structure in our device. The main advantages of copper spring are in the following: (1) Young's modulus of copper is smaller than that of silicon.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Vibration Energy Harvester's Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, MEMS microsprings have more structural shapes and application patterns compared with traditional springs. Now there are no special summaries for the application patterns of MEMS microsprings, which is very inconvenient for the design and fabrication of planar microsprings (Brenner et al 2000;Awaja and Sood 2005;Li and Uttamchandani 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The silicon has much higher yield strength than gallium arsenide (GaAs), copper (Cu), and polymeric material such as Parylene C, PDMS, and SU-8. Moreover, it has many advantages such as low mechanical loss, low material cost, and processing compatibility with CMOS rectifying circuitry [13]. Also, the bulk micromachined silicon spring has merits in terms of mass production and cost reduction through batch fabrication.…”
Section: Design Of Proposed Electromagnetic Energy Harvestersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It generated 0.3μW of output power at the resonant frequency of 4MHz and the optimal load resistance of 39Ω [6][7]. Recently, several electromagnetic energy harvesters were reported using cantilever structures and mass-spring-damper systems [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. These devices were comprised of single steel beam, coils, and magnets which were attached to the end of the beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%