2004 International Conferce on Test
DOI: 10.1109/test.2004.1386944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MRAM defect analysis and fault modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…STT-MRAM testing is still an on-going research topic. Several fault models such as multi-victim, kink, and write destructive faults [7,8] were proposed for field-driven MRAMs. However, these fault models are not applicable to currentdriven STT-MRAMs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STT-MRAM testing is still an on-going research topic. Several fault models such as multi-victim, kink, and write destructive faults [7,8] were proposed for field-driven MRAMs. However, these fault models are not applicable to currentdriven STT-MRAMs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, MTJ-related defects irrespective of their physical natures are modeled as linear resistors either in series with (i.e., OC t in Table 4) or in parallel (i.e., S1 BL-IN in Table 5) to an idea defect-free MTJ device, as can be found in [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Comparing the fault modeling results of our proposed pinhole defect model (PH) with the series resistor model OC t and the parallel resistor model S1 BL-IN reveals the following.…”
Section: Pinhole Defects In Mtj Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing STT-MRAMs is still an emerging research topic. Azevedo et al [8,9] injected resistive shorts and opens into a SPICE model of an MRAM cell and subsequently performed simulations to derive fault models. Su et al [10] did intensive analysis of the excessive magnetic field during write operations and observed write disturbance faults; they validated those using chip measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resistance value represents the defect strength. This approach is also inherited to test emerging non-volatile memories such as STT-MRAM, as can be found in the prior art [8][9][10][11]17]. For any defect in the MTJ device, it is modeled as a linear resistor either in parallel to (R pd ) or in series with (R sd ) a defect-free MTJ model, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Limitations Of Conv Test Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STT-MRAM testing is still an on-going research topic. Several fault models such as multi-victim, kink, and write destructive faults [8,9] were proposed for field-driven MRAMs. However, these fault models are not applicable to current-driven STT-MRAMs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%