1997
DOI: 10.1007/pl00009664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Osmotic adjustment in Fraxinus excelsior L . : malate and mannitol accumulation in leaves under drought conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This seems reasonable prima facie evidence that osmotic adjustment was not induced by summer drought or that solute concentrations were maintained after commencement of irrigation. The latter seems unlikely given that other studies have reported osmotic potential and/or concentrations of solutes returning to pre-treatment condition within a matter of days (Gebre et al 1997;Herppich and Peckmann 1997;CliVord et al 1998) or weeks (Guicherd et al 1997). The absence of active osmotic adjustment (i.e., apart from constitutive adjustment) is somewhat puzzling given that osmotic adjustment has been reported in studies of E. marginata seedlings (Stoneman et al 1994), a range of other Eucalyptus (White et al 2000;Merchant et al 2006b).…”
Section: Osmotic Potential and Solutesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This seems reasonable prima facie evidence that osmotic adjustment was not induced by summer drought or that solute concentrations were maintained after commencement of irrigation. The latter seems unlikely given that other studies have reported osmotic potential and/or concentrations of solutes returning to pre-treatment condition within a matter of days (Gebre et al 1997;Herppich and Peckmann 1997;CliVord et al 1998) or weeks (Guicherd et al 1997). The absence of active osmotic adjustment (i.e., apart from constitutive adjustment) is somewhat puzzling given that osmotic adjustment has been reported in studies of E. marginata seedlings (Stoneman et al 1994), a range of other Eucalyptus (White et al 2000;Merchant et al 2006b).…”
Section: Osmotic Potential and Solutesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…First, the low Ψ noon values observed during the dry period indicate a high capacity of ash trees to absorb water even from relatively dry soils. Active osmotic adjustment during water shortage has been documented in this species by Guicherd et al (1997), based on the accumulation of malate and mannitol in the leaf symplasm.…”
Section: Interspecific Variation In the Relationship Between Xylem Flmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species can develop very low Ψ L (up to -6 MPa, Marigo et al (2000)), and is able to maintain sufficient leaf conductance and CO 2 assimilation during drought (Carlier et al, 1992;Guicherd et al, 1997;Korn, 2004;Marigo et al, 2000). A high maximum g L and a low sensitivity of sap flow to water shortage are elements of a drought-tolerating strategy.…”
Section: Species Adaptation To Droughtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a comparative study, these experiments were also extended to include Fraxinus excelsior trees, which have been found to occur with Acer pseudoplatanus or Acer opalus, depending on the environmental conditions [11]. In fact, the common ash is a mesophilic species that usually thrives on wellwatered alluvial soils, but which can also survive the strong water deficit on hillslopes [7]. These different species are common and widespread throughout the North Alpine region [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%