2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000184807.38037.75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic Significance of Estrogen Receptor Beta in Epithelial Hyperplasia of Usual Type With Known Outcome

Abstract: The prognostic significance of ER-alpha expression in benign proliferative breast disease has been confirmed in epithelial hyperplasia of usual type (HUT). However, little is known about the role of ER-beta in these lesions. Therefore, this study was performed to test the hypothesis that, in HUT lesions, the ratio of ER-alpha:ER-beta is an accurate determinant of breast cancer risk and of predicting subsequent progression to invasive breast cancer. This case-control study analyzed a cohort of benign proliferat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are observational reports of cytoplasmic ERh immunoreactivity in breast cancer (6,7,20,34), and we have previously shown that cytoplasmic expression is related to neoplastic progression with a higher incidence in in situ/invasive carcinoma compared with normal breast/ benign intraductal proliferation (35). We have also shown herein that this staining is specific because it can be blocked by peptide competition, but until now this has not been formally examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…There are observational reports of cytoplasmic ERh immunoreactivity in breast cancer (6,7,20,34), and we have previously shown that cytoplasmic expression is related to neoplastic progression with a higher incidence in in situ/invasive carcinoma compared with normal breast/ benign intraductal proliferation (35). We have also shown herein that this staining is specific because it can be blocked by peptide competition, but until now this has not been formally examined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In addition, ERa is considered to be a key player during progression of benign mammary proliferative disorders to invasive carcinomas. Recent evidence suggests, however, that a high ERa-to-ERb ratio rather than the level of ERa alone is what characterizes those cases of mammary hyperplasia of the usual type that are likely to progress to breast cancer (16). In fact, there is ample evidence that, although ERa expression is maintained in breast cancer compared with benign tumors or normal mammary tissue, ERb expression is decreased (31).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 97%
“…In line with this, 17b-E 2 (hereafter referred to as E 2 ) has been reported to promote the growth of immortalized mammary cells through ERa and inhibit it through ERb (15). In mammary hyperplasia of the usual type, it is the ERa-to-ERb ratio rather than the individual receptor amounts that reportedly is associated with the risk that this lesion will develop into invasive carcinoma (16). Work with ERa-positive breast cancer cells engineered to express increasing amounts of ERb has shown that, although ERb could regulate genes that are not targeted by ERa alone, it increasingly affected genes regulated by ERa as well, although nearly half of ERa target genes were not affected even when the level of ERb was set to be much higher than that of ERa (17).…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Of notice, ER-beta seems to exhibit a pattern inverse to ER-alpha, declining during the progression from normal breast tissue to atypical ductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, and invasive ductal carcinoma [15,18]. The ER-beta/ER-alpha ratio has emerged as an important risk factor; a low ER-beta/ER-alpha ratio seems to predict progression to carcinoma in nonatypical epithelial hyperplasia [19]. It is interesting to note that ER-beta gradual reduction has been reported to be more pronounced in invasive ductal than in invasive lobular carcinomas [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%