Recent review on carbon nanomaterials functionalized with ionic liquids in sample pretreatment application

Jon, Chol-San; Meng, Long‐Yue; Li, Donghao

doi:10.1016/j.trac.2019.115641

Cited by 72 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 119 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Various sample preparation technologies have been widely adopted to concentrate and separate the desired HPAHs from complex matrices, including liquid-liquid extraction [20], SPE [14,21], magnetic solid-phase extraction [13,22,23], and SPME methods [15]. Owing to the importance of the adsorbent material properties in SPME, several adsorbents have received considerable attention, including poly(ionic liquid)s [24][25][26], metal organic frameworks [27,28], covalent organic frameworks [29], and mesoporous silica nanospheres@porous carbon [30]. Such techniques have been applied in the cleanup, enrichment, and separation of HPAHs, and in-tube SPME monolith can be facilely synthesized by in situ polymerization and has been found to overcome the shortcomings of fiber SPME, which tends to suffer from a limited lifetime, fragility, and low enrichment capacity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of a highly efficient in‐tube solid‐phase microextraction system coupled with UHPLC‐MS/MS for analyzing trace hydroxyl polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biological samples

Zhang

Yang

et al. 2021

J of Separation Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hydroxyl polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are considered active mutagenic and carcinogenic substances and are found in extremely low levels (ng/g) in biological samples. As a result, their determination in urine and blood samples is challenging, and a sensitive and effective method for the analysis of trace hydroxyl polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in complex biological matrices is required. In this work, a novel macroporous in-tube solid-phase microextraction monolith was prepared via a thiol-yne click reaction, and a highly efficient analytical method based on in-tube solid-phase microextraction coupled with UHPLC-MS/MS was developed to determine hydroxyl polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with low detection limits of 0.137-11.0 ng/L in complex biological samples. Four hydroxyl polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, namely, 2-hydroxyanthraquinone, 1-hydroxypyrene, 1,8-dihydroxyanthraquinone, and 6hydroxychrysene, were determined in the urine samples of smokers, nonsmokers, and whole blood samples of mice. Satisfactory recoveries were achieved in the range of 83.1-113% with relative standard deviations of 3.2-9.7%. It was found that implementation of the macroporous monolith gave a highly efficient approach for enriching trace hydroxyl polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biological samples.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of a highly efficient in‐tube solid‐phase microextraction system coupled with UHPLC‐MS/MS for analyzing trace hydroxyl polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biological samples

Zhang

Yang

et al. 2021

J of Separation Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Signal detection of the analytical instrument of the target analyte at a low concentration is always challenging because of the highly complicated media and different interferences from the matrix of any real sample such as biological, food, water, and environmental samples [10]. Accordingly, it is a need to develop a novel, effective, fast, inexpensive, and simple sample preparation technique to isolate analyte components of the samples and preconcentrate them to a detectable limit [11]. Several pretreatment techniques including solid phase extraction (SPE) [12], dispersive solid phase extraction (DSPE) [13], solid phase microextraction (SPME) [14], magnetic solid phase extraction (MSPE) [15], liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) [16,17], molecular imprinted polymer (MIP) [18], stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) [19], pipette tip microsolid phase extraction [20], molecularly imprinted stir bar sorptive extraction (MIPSB) [21], microwave-assisted extraction (MASE) [22], membrane extraction [23], solid phase extraction (SPE) [24], supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) [25], and silver nanoparticle stir bar sorptive extraction [26] have been used widespread application for preconcentration and isolate trace level compound of complicated matrices.…”

Section: Sample Preparation Techniquesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modern Sample Preparation Techniques: A Brief Introduction

Sargazi¹,

Hashemi²,

Kaykhaii³

2021

Sample Preparation Techniques for Chemical Analysis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Due to fast growth in microprocessors, analytical instrumentations in spectroscopy, chromatography, microscopy, sensors and microdevices have been subjected to significant developments. Despite these advances, a sample preparation step is indispensable before instrumental analysis. Main reasons are low sensitivity of the instruments, matrix interferences and incompatibility of the sample with the analytical device. Most of the time spent and most of the errors occurring during a chemical analysis is on sample preparation step. As a result, any improvements in this essential process will have a significant effect on shortening the analysis time and its precision and accuracy and lowering the cost. This introductory chapter intends to draw the readers’ attention to the importance of sample preparation, the procedures of sampling and the source of errors that occur in the course of sampling. The chapter then continues with a heading on sample preparation techniques, including exhaustive and non-exhaustive methods of extraction. Microwave, sonication and membrane-based extraction techniques are more emphasized as exhaustive methods and under a new title, miniaturized methods are discussed. Automation, on-line compatibility and simplification is an important aspect of any sample preparation and extraction which is discussed at the end of this chapter.

show abstract

“…Besides those alterations to these materials, they can also be combined with other materials, such as ionic liquids (ILs). This combination is performed to allow the use of the advantages of carbon nanomaterials and ILs and the formation of a material with promising extraction capability [120,122]. Due to their characteristics related to electron transfer, carbon‐based materials are widely used as electrodes and electrochemical sensors, and several successful combinations of these materials with others are reported for the determination of BPA [123–131].…”

Section: Carbon‐based Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Determination of bisphenol A: Old problem, recent creative solutions based on novel materials

Huelsmann

Will

Carasek

2020

J of Separation Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bisphenol A is a synthetic compound widely used in industry, in the production of polycarbonate, epoxy resins, and thermal paper, among others. Its annual production is estimated at millions of tons per year, demonstrating its importance. Despite its wide application in various everyday products, once in the environment (due to its disposal or leaching), it has high toxicity to humans and animal life, and this problem has been well known for years. Given this problem, many researchers seek alternatives for its monitoring in matrices such as natural water, waste, food, and biological matrices. For this, new advanced materials have been developed, characterized, and applied in creative ways for the preparation of samples for the determination of bisphenol A. This article aims to present some of these important and recent applications, describing the use of molecularly imprinted polymers, metal and covalent organic frameworks, ionic liquids and magnetic ionic liquids, and deep eutectic solvents as creative solutions in sample preparation for the long-standing problem of bisphenol A determination. K E Y W O R D S bisphenol A, carbon nanomaterials, ionic liquids, metal-organic frameworks, molecularly imprinted polymers Article Related Abbreviations: [C 6 (MIM) 2 ]Br 2 , 1-hexyl-di-(3-methylimidazolium) bromide; [C 6 MIM][FeCl 4 ], 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrachloroferrate; [C 6 MIM][NTf 2 ], 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide; [C 8 C 1 IM][NTf 2 ], 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium bis((trifluoromethane)sulfonyl)imide; [C 8 MIM][PF

show abstract

Recent review on carbon nanomaterials functionalized with ionic liquids in sample pretreatment application

Cited by 72 publications

References 119 publications

Development of a highly efficient in‐tube solid‐phase microextraction system coupled with UHPLC‐MS/MS for analyzing trace hydroxyl polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biological samples

Development of a highly efficient in‐tube solid‐phase microextraction system coupled with UHPLC‐MS/MS for analyzing trace hydroxyl polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biological samples

Modern Sample Preparation Techniques: A Brief Introduction

Determination of bisphenol A: Old problem, recent creative solutions based on novel materials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About