2018
DOI: 10.31254/phyto.2018.7221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) varieties for resistance against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita race-1

Abstract: Thirty brinjal varieties were screened for their resistance / susceptibility to root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita race-1) infestation. Out of 30 brinjal varieties, eighteen varieties viz., Black Beauty, Brinjal 1 hybrid, Brinjal No.38, Chamak, Govinda, Green round, Nagina, Nav Kiran, Neel Kamal, Nishant, P.K-123, Prabha Kiran, Prasad, Sukhda, Surya Kiran, i9Utkal, VNR-51 and VNR-60 were highly susceptible, seven varieties (Brinjal Advance, Brinjal BSS1013, Green long, Harshit, Prapti, Shamli and Ujjwal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the twenty cultivars, only ‘Noagram’ was found to be ‘moderately resistant’, and the responses of the rest of the cultivars were ‘susceptible’ to ‘highly susceptible’. These findings are supported by two similar screening experiments conducted in Bangladesh and India, where very few brinjal cultivars were found to have significant resistance to RKN ( Begum et al., 2014 ; Akhter and Khan, 2018 ). In most screening trials, RKN is considered a generalized pest, although the combination of crop and pest species plays an important role in the outcome of resistance or susceptibility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the twenty cultivars, only ‘Noagram’ was found to be ‘moderately resistant’, and the responses of the rest of the cultivars were ‘susceptible’ to ‘highly susceptible’. These findings are supported by two similar screening experiments conducted in Bangladesh and India, where very few brinjal cultivars were found to have significant resistance to RKN ( Begum et al., 2014 ; Akhter and Khan, 2018 ). In most screening trials, RKN is considered a generalized pest, although the combination of crop and pest species plays an important role in the outcome of resistance or susceptibility.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…javanica . Data on growth parameters of plants and reproductive parameters of nematodes were recorded 45 days after inoculation (DAI) and 90 DAI ( Akhter and Khan, 2018 ). Eggs were extracted from egg masses following the sugar floatation method with 40% sucrose solution ( Hussey and Barker, 1973 ), and J 2 from soil was extracted by a modified centrifugal-flotation technique ( Jenkins, 1964 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control plant (TE Silila) had the number of galls/roots was 36.33 this indicates that the number of galls/roots in each plant was significantly different (Table 2). The results of the calculation of the gall index showed that the resistance of the 30 accessions tested showed The mean followed by the same letter shows no significant difference (DMRT α=0.05) The mean followed by the same letter shows no significant difference (DMRT α=0.05) *Based on gall index 0 (Resistant), 1 (1-2 Resistant), 2 (Moderate Resistant), 3 (Moderate Sustainable), 4 (Sustainable), 5 (Highly Sustainable) Hussain (1986) [1].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To categorize the tested accessions eggplant as susceptible or resistance to M.incognita we used two scales; the first was root gall index ranges which determinted according to Hussain (1986) [1] as follow : Index gall 0 = highly resistant (HR), 1 = 110 galls = resistant (R), 2 = 11-20 galls = Moderate resistant (MR), 3 = 21-30 galls = Moderate susceptible (MS), 4 = 31-100 galls = susceptible (S), 5 = >100 galls = highly susceptible (HS). The second scale was depending on the rate of build-up (Pf/Pi) according to Taylor & Sasser (1978) [12] : ≥ 3 = highly susceptible (HS), 2-3 = susceptible (S), 1-2 = moderate susceptible (MS), 0.5-1.0 = moderate resistant (MR), 0.3-0.5 = resistant (R), dan ≤0.3 = highly resistant (HR).…”
Section: Screening Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation