Risk management for sustainable tourism

Ural, Mert

doi:10.1515/ejthr-2016-0007

Cited by 15 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The dimensions of equipment, financial, physical, psychological, satisfaction, social and time risks identified in earlier studies (Cheron & Ritchie, 1982;Roehl & Fesenmaier, 1992) were expanded to 10 dimensions with the addition of heath, terrorism and political instability (Sönmez & Graefe, 1998a). The perceived risks are found to negatively impact destination business in terms of damage to infrastructure, reduction in tourist receipts and tour cancellations (Misrahi, 2016;Ural, 2016, Zhu & Deng, 2020. Tourists avoid destinations perceived risky because of higher safety concerns (Cossens & Gin, 1995;Demos, 1992;Pinhey & Iverson, 1994;Sönmez & Graefe, 1998b).…”

Section: Perceived Risks and Tourist Behaviourmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Perceived Risk on Tourist Satisfaction and Future Travel Intentions: A Mediation–Moderation Analysis

Chaudhary

Islam

2021

Global Business Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research study is conducted in the Kashmir Valley, which is rated heavenly for its natural beauty. However, it is also perceived as risky by the outsiders since 1989. Earlier, it was a very popular destination for tourists and for shooting of films. Kashmir still gets good number of tourists, but the puzzle of impact of perceived risks on their behaviour still remains blurred. This research study is an attempt to understand the behaviour of tourists visiting Kashmir in terms of satisfaction from tour and future travel-related intentions as an outcome of perceived risk. Tourist satisfaction as mediator and demographic variables as moderator are carried out to gain insight into the behaviour of these tourists. The results of the study show that tourist satisfaction and future travel intentions of tourists in the Kashmir Valley are not impacted by their perception of risks. The results are a valuable input for DMOs that suggests that risks at the destination cannot be taken as the default barrier to the promotion of tourism. The necessary supply-side interventions at the destination to mitigate identified perceived risks by tourists and tourism relationship strategies at the demand side to address tour satisfaction can reflect in rewarding future travel intentions like revisits and recommendations.

show abstract

Section: Perceived Risks and Tourist Behaviourmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Perceived Risk on Tourist Satisfaction and Future Travel Intentions: A Mediation–Moderation Analysis

Chaudhary

Islam

2021

Global Business Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Accordingly, the identification of visitor management flow is necessary to measure the traffic congestion and pollutions on the destination to meet tourist and local needs and wants [26] . Risk management in the tourism context refers to the planning and implementing processes directed towards managing the negative affect and alternative solutions [44] . The destination is also required to identify the risk, crisis management, and opportunities on climate change adaptation and the strategy, management, design development, and information regarding climate change that publicly available [10] .…”

Section: Principle A(c) Managingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable Tourism Destination Assessment as a Baseline for Tanjung Kelayang Tourism Development

Andrariladchi

Arunotai

2021

taiwanproceeding

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tourism is a complex and prominent sector in Indonesia that involved many stakeholders. Led by the success story of Bali tourism development which able to grow beyond all expectation, helping to improve public and private infrastructure, including the birth and growth of small-medium enterprises, led the Indonesian government to distribute and spread the development all over Indonesia through Ten New Bali concept. One of these is Tanjung Kelayang, located in Belitung Island. Despite Bali success stories, negative impacts of Bali tourism development on environmental sustainability appeared, such as land-use change, soil and water degradation, pollutions, waste mismanagement, etc. Reflected from Bali negative tourism impact, this paper will identify and analyse Tanjung Kelayang tourism development as a New Bali using sustainable tourism destination criteria to create baseline data. A qualitative approach using both primary data by on-site observation and in-depth interview with related parties, and secondary data by identifying the Local Official Tourism Development Master Plan (RIPPARKAB) year 2014 and other studies in regards with Tanjung Kelayang tourism development by using GSTC-D V2 as a tool to reflect sustainability commitment was occurred on this paper. The result of compliance shows that only 19% for Sustainable Management, 4% for Socio-Economy Sustainability, 11% for Cultural Sustainability, and 0% for Environmental Sustainability. Thus, it shows the gap of Tanjung Kelayang tourism development in regards with sustainable destination concept. Hence, a commitment, communication, and cooperation from all related parties is necessary to be in place to achieve a sustainable tourism destination development in Tanjung Kelayang.

show abstract

“…Strategically, this means ensuring security in the first place for visitors, but also employees in tourism and other activities, security in the environment and in general the creation of a positive image in this regard (Štetić, 2010). The systemic solution of every country which wants that its tourist destinations will be on the world tourist map is to create security strategies and risk management separately for each attractive location (Ural, 2016).…”

Section: Changes In the Form Of Tourist Behavior As A Consequence Of The Crisismentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Eu Funding Support the Diversification of the Tourism Offer in Serbia as a Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic?

Maksimović¹,

Stamatović²

2021

Tourism Challenges Amid Covid-19

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the paper is to answer the question of whether EU funding supports tourism in Serbia in a situation where this sector of the economy is facing astonishing figures of decline which is caused by the coronavirus. The paper is divided into two segments. The first part is based on the presentation of the possibility of diversification of the tourist offer in Serbia and the second part provides an overview of the literature related to EU funds. The research is interdisciplinary because it includes selective forms of tourism which united in a single tourist product can contribute to a tourist valorization of all areas and contribute as a response to the crisis caused by the pandemic. Contribution of EU funds can be seen through the connection between investment activities and the increase in tourist traffic. The special goal of the paper is education and raising awareness about the preservation of rural and eco areas, eco production and healthy lifestyles, which will contribute to the tourist offer and also a pleasure and enjoyment for visitors.

show abstract

Risk management for sustainable tourism

Cited by 15 publications

References 8 publications

Impact of Perceived Risk on Tourist Satisfaction and Future Travel Intentions: A Mediation–Moderation Analysis

Impact of Perceived Risk on Tourist Satisfaction and Future Travel Intentions: A Mediation–Moderation Analysis

Sustainable Tourism Destination Assessment as a Baseline for Tanjung Kelayang Tourism Development

Does Eu Funding Support the Diversification of the Tourism Offer in Serbia as a Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About