2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.09.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentinel Node Biopsy as Staging Tool in a Multimodality Treatment Approach to Cancer of the Oral Cavity and the Oropharynx

Abstract: Method promises reduction of elective ND and morbidity in N0 patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
21
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity rate is poorer than that found in other studies with surgical staging by SNB [21,47]. In the multicenter study published by Ross et al [21] with 52 patients with T1 and T2 tumors of the oral cavity, only two false negative cases of nodal disease were found in the follow-up and a high rate of true positives resulting in a sensitivity rate of 91%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The sensitivity rate is poorer than that found in other studies with surgical staging by SNB [21,47]. In the multicenter study published by Ross et al [21] with 52 patients with T1 and T2 tumors of the oral cavity, only two false negative cases of nodal disease were found in the follow-up and a high rate of true positives resulting in a sensitivity rate of 91%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The rate of occult metastases in 366 patients with cN0 disease presented at The Second International Conference on Sentinel Node Biopsy in Mucosal Head and Neck Cancer was 29% revealed by, and an additional 4% not revealed by sentinel node biopsy. [13] In our department, sentinel node biopsy has been carried out since 2000, [14,15] and the upstaging rate in patients treated with pre-surgical iaCHT with high-dose cisplatin revealed by scintigraphic lymph node mapping and sentinel node biopsy has been 12% due to sentinel nodes, and an additional 4% due to nonsentinel nodes. All patients without further neck treatment remained free of neck metastases to date (mean follow-up: 31.5 months).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le curage est ré alisé uniquement si le GS montre un envahissement tumoral. En effet, de nombreuses é tudes ont validé la fiabilité de cette technique, qui n'engendre pas plus d'é chec ganglionnaire que l'é videment de principe, aussi bien en termes de contrô le local que de survie [5,[15][16][17][18]25,27,29]. Les patients chez qui aucun traitement chirurgical n'a é té retenu, pourraient aussi bé né ficier de la recherche du GS dans une optique de dé flation thé rapeutique.…”
Section: Gs : Indicationsunclassified