2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectators’ aerothermal comfort assessment method in stadia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, there were fewer case studies focusing on cold areas or the winter season [11]. One of the methods commonly used to assess thermal comfort in winter is the wind chill, and the wind chill is applied in the field of pedestrian thermal comfort [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, there were fewer case studies focusing on cold areas or the winter season [11]. One of the methods commonly used to assess thermal comfort in winter is the wind chill, and the wind chill is applied in the field of pedestrian thermal comfort [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Favourable micro-environmental conditions in semioutdoor stadium structures, initially reported by [30], indicated that aerothermal comfort conditions may be achieved with wind threshold speed values between 0.1 m/s, to ensure minimum air movement, and 3.6 m/s, to prevent wind disturbance and performance impairment. On the basis of these considerations, the output parameters were set as the flow homogeneity values on the spectator tiers and the playing field area, the ventilation flow rate through the roof opening, and the overall pressure in the stadium bowl.…”
Section: Selection Of Output Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to literature, stadium structures have been extensively studied in order to determine optimum geometrical configurations to provide comfort conditions for both players and spectators [4,5,30]. The roof dimensional characteristics seem to be the major contributors on the attainment of micro-environmental satisfaction.…”
Section: Selection Of Input Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on experimental wind tunnel tests, such a central opening is preferable in cooler climates, since it acts as a protector, attenuating the intense airflow beyond the playing field [27]. However, when combined with a peripheral continuous opening between the roof and the upper spectator terrace, leads to increase of local ventilation rates for the benefit of users in warm climates [26]. A football arena that takes advantage of the aforementioned oculus design features is the Stade de France.…”
Section: Aero-thermal Comfort Master Plansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chart is representative of the comfort thresholds set for spectators in open stadia and it incorporates four dominant climatic parameters; the air temperature, air speed, humidity and solar radiation (see Ref. [25], [26] for further details). When stadium configuration and outdoor environmental conditions do not allow the natural air distribution (within the temperature thresholds) to be implemented, moderate microclimate conditions should be produced, by passive or active cooling techniques [22].…”
Section: Technical Requirements For Stadiumsmentioning
confidence: 99%