The impact of COVID-19 on food prices in China: evidence of four major food products from Beijing, Shandong and Hubei Provinces

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to empirically study the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on food prices in China and provides policy implications for crisis management for other countries who are still under the crisis of COVID-19 and for the future in China and beyond as well.Design/methodology/approachThis paper first designed a theoretical model of market equilibrium, which shows that the impact of COVID-19 on food prices is linked to the impact difference on demand and supply in response to the COVID-19 crisis. Then we collected the representative prices data for four major food products (rice, wheat flour, pork and Chinese cabbages) from three provinces (Shandong as a producing base, Beijing as a consumption base and Hubei as the epicenter), and set up an iGARCH model.Findings(1) No significant impact on rice and wheat flour prices, (2) significantly positive impact on cabbages prices and (3) various impact on pork prices. Note that the outbreak and the severity of COVID-19 have different impacts. The outbreak itself may have a relatively large impact on pork and cabbage prices, which may result from social panic, while the magnitude of the impact of severity is relatively small, and some are negative, perhaps due to more reduced demand during the quarantine.Practical implicationsChina always puts food security in its prior position of policy agenda and has been preparing for the worst scenario of the food security crisis. In the anti-COVID-19 campaign, China's local governments developed many measures to ensure food provision for each consumer. Hence, the impact of COVID-19 on food prices is minor. However, the outbreak of COVID-19 crisis could cause social panic in some scenarios where consumers may hoard food. Eventually, it may form a vicious cycle to push up food prices. This will be a challenging policy issue in crisis management for almost all governments.Originality/valueThis paper provides empirical evidence on the impact of COVID-19 on food prices in China. China has basically contained the COVID-19 in the whole country, and no major food crisis occurred during this process. The results will provide information on crisis management for other countries that are still under the COVID-19 crisis, and for future China and beyond.

Food price volatility and socio-inequalities in household food insecurity during coronavirus disease-2019 lockdown in Nansana municipality, Wakiso district Uganda

“…However, the staple food price signi cantly reduced when the lockdown was partially lifted. These ndings are consistent with what was reported that food prices had increased in Kampala, the capital city of Uganda during enforcing the COVID-19 lockdown [11] and in some European countries [39] and urban China [40]. However, the food price increase observed in this study was higher at over 17% compared to 1% in European countries during enforcing the covid-19 lockdown [39].…”

Feedbacks between global supply chain disruption and the spread of SARS-CoV-2

“…Asia and Oceania are impacted the most in their Heavy Manufacturing sector. Interestingly, the analysis shows that the shortage of Processed Food, and Livestock and Meat Products in Asia are significantly greater compared to other regions, which is consistent with the raise in the price of pork reported in Asian countries 35,36 . Textiles and Clothing, suffer a remarkable shortage due to the shared input materials with the HHS resources, i.e., cloth and masks.…”

Analysis and vulnerability of the international wheat trade network

“…7 Evolution of the population affected by an export ban in one of the 20 largest wheat producers such price increases do not need to happen. For example, in China the impact of COVID-19 on rice and wheat flour prices was insignificant (Yu et al, 2020). Major producers such as Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Romania imposed export limits (in the latter case just for one week after the intervention of the EU).…”