2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2020.100901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The status of hydrogen technologies in the UK: A multi-disciplinary review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of hydrogen production, a comprehensive work that has gathered and compared the cost of hydrogen and capital costs for H 2 production found that the costs of SMR with CCS are comparable or even lower than alternative methods such as gasification with and without CCS, nuclear thermolysis, and electrolysis [71]. All technological options are needed to reach the ambition target of net zero emissions by 2050, and CCS is indeed essential for the reduction of industrial emissions and hydrogen production.…”
Section: Competing Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of hydrogen production, a comprehensive work that has gathered and compared the cost of hydrogen and capital costs for H 2 production found that the costs of SMR with CCS are comparable or even lower than alternative methods such as gasification with and without CCS, nuclear thermolysis, and electrolysis [71]. All technological options are needed to reach the ambition target of net zero emissions by 2050, and CCS is indeed essential for the reduction of industrial emissions and hydrogen production.…”
Section: Competing Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…61 Furthermore, from an economic stance, EVs currently dominate the market because they are more cost competitive to ICEVs than HVs. 62 Similarly, to electric transport, there remains the 'chicken and egg' scenario as consumer demands for hydrogen remain low and are often not considered economically feasible to build large-scale hydrogen fuelling stations. 63 Therefore, integration will require significant nationwide infrastructure requirements to ensure market progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public awareness and acceptance of hydrogen is crucial for the adoption, deployment, and scaleup of FCEVs and supporting hydrogen infrastructure (Ricci, Bellaby, and Flynn 2008). Educational campaigns and other outreach measures to increase public awareness of hydrogen's safety and potential environmental benefits-as well as the cost and capabilities of the technology, especially when coupled with PV-are critical to developing a favorable public perception of hydrogen (Edwards, Font-Palma, and Howe 2021;Iribarren et al 2016). As consumer adoption and awareness of FCEVs and hydrogen increase, it is imperative to maintain a consistent focus on safety to reinforce the public perception that hydrogen technologies are safe.…”
Section: Public Acceptance and Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%