2019
DOI: 10.1002/pip.3227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The versatility of passivating carrier‐selective silicon thin films for diverse high‐efficiency screen‐printed heterojunction‐based solar cells

Abstract: Providing state-of-the-art surface passivation and the required carrier selectivity for both contacts, hydrogenated amorphous silicon thin films are the key components of silicon heterojunction (SHJ) solar cells. After intensive optimization of these layers for standard front and back contacted (FBC) n-type cells, high surface passivation levels were achieved on cell precursors, demonstrated by minority carrier lifetimes exceeding 18 ms on float-zone (FZ) and 11 ms on Czochralski (Cz) c-Si wafers. The applicat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Substantial progress on high-efficiency p-type silicon solar cells has recently been made, such as work by Haase et al with an interdigitated back contact solar cell featuring tunnel oxide-doped polycrystalline silicon contacts with efficiency of 26.1% (float-zone [FZ] silicon with resistivity of 100 Ω cm and V OC of 727 mV) [9] and by Descoeudres et al on a SHJ structure with efficiencies of 23.8% (FZ silicon with V OC of 723 mV) and 23.6% (Cz silicon with V OC of 740 mV). [10] While the V OC of the champion p-type Cz SHJ solar cell from Descoeudres et al is comparable with the V OC of the world-record n-type SHJ solar cell from Yoshikawa et al, the fill factor (FF) of the p-type device is 4.1% abs lower. However, the average efficiency of larger batches of identically processed n-type and gettered p-type SHJ solar cells was at the same level, [10] suggesting that p-type SHJ solar cells may be able to achieve the same average efficiencies as n-type SHJ solar cells in production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Substantial progress on high-efficiency p-type silicon solar cells has recently been made, such as work by Haase et al with an interdigitated back contact solar cell featuring tunnel oxide-doped polycrystalline silicon contacts with efficiency of 26.1% (float-zone [FZ] silicon with resistivity of 100 Ω cm and V OC of 727 mV) [9] and by Descoeudres et al on a SHJ structure with efficiencies of 23.8% (FZ silicon with V OC of 723 mV) and 23.6% (Cz silicon with V OC of 740 mV). [10] While the V OC of the champion p-type Cz SHJ solar cell from Descoeudres et al is comparable with the V OC of the world-record n-type SHJ solar cell from Yoshikawa et al, the fill factor (FF) of the p-type device is 4.1% abs lower. However, the average efficiency of larger batches of identically processed n-type and gettered p-type SHJ solar cells was at the same level, [10] suggesting that p-type SHJ solar cells may be able to achieve the same average efficiencies as n-type SHJ solar cells in production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…[10] While the V OC of the champion p-type Cz SHJ solar cell from Descoeudres et al is comparable with the V OC of the world-record n-type SHJ solar cell from Yoshikawa et al, the fill factor (FF) of the p-type device is 4.1% abs lower. However, the average efficiency of larger batches of identically processed n-type and gettered p-type SHJ solar cells was at the same level, [10] suggesting that p-type SHJ solar cells may be able to achieve the same average efficiencies as n-type SHJ solar cells in production. It is important to note that with the addition of a dedicated gettering step to improve material quality, Descoeudres et al observed an efficiency gain of %0.2% abs in batches of p-type SHJ solar cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations