2002
DOI: 10.1075/target.14.1.05jaa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Think-aloud protocol studies into translation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
24
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The time factor is central in terms of the validity and reliability of the data elicited, which will be discussed further in Section 2.1. As was mentioned above, think-aloud was the first method used in process research (see Jääskeläinen 2002;Göpferich 2009:16ff. ), while retrospection has been increasingly used particularly together with other methods, such as keylogging (see below).…”
Section: State-of-the-art: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time factor is central in terms of the validity and reliability of the data elicited, which will be discussed further in Section 2.1. As was mentioned above, think-aloud was the first method used in process research (see Jääskeläinen 2002;Göpferich 2009:16ff. ), while retrospection has been increasingly used particularly together with other methods, such as keylogging (see below).…”
Section: State-of-the-art: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ericsson i Smith 1991). Ograniczenia niniejszego artykułu nie pozwalają na szersze przedstawienie wyników różnych badań empirycznych nad procesem przekładu z udziałem uczestników charakteryzujących się różnym poziomem kompetencji tłumaczeniowej (pisze o tym Jääskeläinen 2002).…”
Section: Kompetencja Tłumaczeniowaunclassified
“…Reviews of research into the translation process (Rodrigues 2001(Rodrigues , 2002Orozco 2002;Jäaskeläinen 2002;Krings 2005) underscore the heterogeneity of research endeavors as to their aims, the number and characteristics of informants, the languages considered and data-collection tools. So, results are hardly comparable.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%