The purpose of this study was to analyze the implementation of the concept of diversion procedure at the investigation stage in the completion of the crime by children. This study uses a kind of normative legal research, which is a process to find the rule of law, principles of law and legal doctrines in order to answer the legal issues faced in order to obtain the arguments, theories or concepts as prescriptions in solving the problem. The concept of diversion at the stage of implementation procedures in the completion of the investigation of criminal acts committed by children there are three forms, namely: First, Police Conference. The party consisted of the police and offender. Type of crime is violations and minor crime. Second, the Family Conference. The parties involved are the police, offender and /or parent/guardian, and the supervising community. Type of crime is a minor crime, crime without victim and crime the value of the losses of victims not more than the provincial minimum wage. Third, Public Conference. The parties involved are the police, offender and/or parent/guardian, the victim and/or the parent/guardian and supervising community and society. Type of crime is a crime punishable by prison of less than 7 (seven) years and not a repetition of crime.

The aim of this research is first, to find out the characteristic of crime in Wetland Environment in Hulu Sungai Utara Regency. Secondly, to know the description of law enforcement in the Wetland Environment Area in Hulu Sungai Utara Regency. The method of this research is normative law research supported by field data (sociolegal research). The result of the research shows the characteristic of criminal acts in the environment, which is the Illegal Fishing of small fishermen by using the stun device with the transportation of boats conducted in the river, lake, and swamp areas. Illegal Fishing Crime is done to meet the needs of daily economic life. The law enforcement on illegal fishing, conducted by preventive efforts by the way of socialization to the community both collectively and individually, both organized and situational at the scene. Repressive efforts are conducted in 2 (two) forms: (1) through the process outside the judiciary and (2) in the judiciary. The process outside of the judiciary is conducted through criminal mediation based on police discretion, whereas through the judicial process is carried out by the process of investigation followed by prosecution and criminal detention through a court decision

<p>Penelitian bertujuan untuk menganalisis dasar hukum yang diterapkan oleh Majelis Hakim dan jenis pidana yang dijatuhkan oleh Majelis Hakim dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Stabat No. 10/Pid.Sus Anak/2015/PN.Stb telah tepat. Dari penelitian tersebut diperoleh hasil di dalam dakwaan yang kedua Jaksa Penuntut Umum mendakwa dengan Pasal 114 ayat (2) UU Narkotika, sementara Majelis Hakim di dalam pertimbangannya menguraikan tentang unsur-unsur tindak pidana yang terdapat di dalam Pasal 112 ayat (1) UU Narkotika, yaitu dalam bentuk memiliki tanpa izin. Padahal di dalam amar putusannya Majelis Hakim menyatakan bahwa terdakwa terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan menjadi perantara dalam jual beli. Dan terdapat ketidaksesuaian yaitu pada pertimbangnnya Majelis Hakim menilai bahwa pidana yang tepat untuk dijatuhkan adalah pidana pengawasan sebagaimana diatur di dalam Pasal 71 ayat (1) huruf b angka 3 dan Pasal  77 ayat (2) UU No. 11 Tahun 2012, sementara di dalam amar putusannya Majelis Hakim menjatuhkan pidana penjara dan denda. Penjatuhan pidana denda itu bertentangan dengan Pasal 71 ayat (3) UU No. 11 Tahun 2012.</p>Kata Kunci : Pertimbangan Hakim, Pidana Anak, Narkotika

The aim of this study is to know and analyze the basic idea of the necessityfor the approval of the Notary Honor Assemblies to the Notary examination in thecriminal justice process and on the approval of the Notary Honor Assemblies to theNotary examination in the criminal justice process in relation to the principle fast,simple and low cost trial. This research uses doctrinal law research done or aimedat a concept that will be studied which is the concept or principle of fast, simpleand low cost trial in relation with the authority of Honorary Notary Assembly to thechecking of Notary in criminal justice process. The basic rationale of the existenceof this NHA is the effort to enforce the obligation to deny or deny notary rights(the obligation to conceal the contents of the deed). Thus, the NHA’s approval asa opening “key” to the obligation of Notaries public when facing the complicatedlegal process. Legal protection of notary as regulated in Article 66 paragraph (1)law of the Repulic of Indonesia concerning Position of Notary (LPN) is a legalprotection to notary public as a public official who is performing its task andobligation in carrying out government authority to keep the state documents in theform of authentic deed. The request for approval from NHA is not only done bythe investigator at the stage of investigation, but will also be requested again bythe prosecutor for the prosecution and by the judge for the court hearing not inaccordance with one of the principles in the criminal justice process that is fast,simple and low cost court principle. For the seizure of the copy of the minuta deedand the summon to the Notaries must first the investigator, the prosecutor and thejudge send the application for approval to NHA. It is said not to be in accordancewith the simple justice principle because according to Article 66 Law of Position ofNotary (LPN), the request for the approval of NHA is done at every stage of criminaljustice process.

<p>The  fact  that  there  are  some  data  that  indicate  the  involvement  of  children  in  criminal acts. Criminal acts of children in society have forced the child “in conflict with the law”. The settlement of child problem conflicting with the law in the context of society can be done with out of court by the principles of togetherness and openness. This method is much more beneficial for children’s development, both physically and psychologically when compared to the punishment. Formal law enforcement should be avoided as far as possible to children who commit a crimes as long as there is no guarantee for their benefit. Because of this article, the author tries to find a solution how it should be to resolve the issue of children in conflict with the law..</p> <p>Kenyataan  bahwa  ada  beberapa  data  yang  menunjukkan  keterlibatan  anak-anak  yang dalam  tindak  pidana  kriminal.  Tindak  pidana  anak  di  masyarakat  telah  memaksa  diri anak “berkonflik dengan hukum”. Penyelesaian persoalan anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum  dalam  konteks  sosial  masyarakat  dapat  dilakukan  dengan  upaya  damai   di  luar pengadilan  dengan  prinsip  kebersamaan  dan  keterbukaan.  Penyelesaian  cara  ini  jauh lebih menguntungkan bagi perkembangan anak baik secara fisik maupun secara psikologis jika dibandingkan dengan pemidanaan. Penegak hukum secara formal hendaknya sejauh mungkin  dihindari  terhadap  anak  yang  melakukan  tindak  kriminal  selama  tidak  ada jaminan kemaslahatan bagi mereka. Karena itu melalui artikel ini penulis mencoba untuk mencarikan solusi bagaimana seharusnya menyelesaikan persoalan anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum</p>