Empirically in Indonesia, banking corruption crime is almost done every year. For that reason, preventive action becomes crucial act to prevent corruption and banking crimes. Banking corruption crime is an action that against the law which usually be done by employees, directors, commissioners, shareholders, and/or banking affiliation parties that caused national financial losses to be the imposition of corruption crime on the party concerned. The stipulation that regulated about banking in Indonesia is occurred in Law Number of 1992 concerning Banking with relation to Law Number 10 of 1998 concerning Amended Law Number Year 1992 concerning Banking. While the stipulation concerning criminal code is stipulated in Law Number 31 of 1999 with conjunction to Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption. As a preventive effort of banking corruption crime, then it needs comprehensive banking legislation renewal within the framework of national development in Indonesia. This research is purposed to understand the banking legislation renewal as a preventive effort of banking corruption crime. This research is a normative legal research which using statutory approach and conceptual.

This study aims to answer problems regarding the application of criminal law principles to tax manipulation as a corruption crime in West Kalimantan Province, as well as whether tax manipulation can be qualified as a corruption crime. The research methodology used includes normative and sociological legal research with a literature study and field study approach. The results show that the application of the principles and principles of criminal law to tax manipulation as a criminal act of corruption in West Kalimantan Province is criminal liability, criminal liability is essentially a mechanism built by criminal law to react to violations of the law, and the Tax Manipulation Regulations. so that it meets the requirements. as a Corruption Crime, as for the elements that can be regarded as a criminal act of corruption based on Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Corruption Crime Act, namely "everyone enriches himself, another person or a corporation, by violating the law, and can harm state finances or the state economy". The elements in Article 3 of the Corruption Law are "every person with the aim of benefiting himself or another person, or a corporation, abuses the authority, opportunity or means available to him because of his position or position and can harm state finances. or the country's economy. The conclusion of this research is the description of Article by Article of the KUP Law and the Corruption Crime Act against the cases above, it can be understood that in the case of criminal acts in the field of taxation that are detrimental to state finances, both laws have the authority to resolve criminal acts in the field of taxation. which is detrimental to state finances;

Insurance is something that is often discussed today in people's lives. The problems that will be discussed in this study are the public lack of understanding of insurance laws, inefficient or late payment claims processes, rejected insurance claims, unaffordable premiums for the lower middle class, and the causes of premium income to decline due to the Covid-pandemic. 19, weak regulatory oversight. The purpose of this study is to clarify the definition of insurance law, the selection of the right insurance, the rights of customer claims are regulated by the Financial Services Authority Rule, the customer understands insurance law regarding rejected claims, the role of a firm regulator in evaluating and supervising and overcoming problems in the insurance industry for legal protection. for the community. The method used in this research is qualitative research methods. The procedures for data collection in the form of interviews, data from field observations, analysis sourced from books. The results of this study indicate the insurance laws that govern the insurance industry in Indonesian society. Customer relationships with insurance companies are regulated by statutory regulations. Firmness of regulators in handling problems in insurance. The existence of insurance law must be understood and obeyed by the insurance company and the customer as well as the regulator must be able to be firm in carrying out its duties.

Nurses as health workers in carrying out their duties and professions often face what appears to be malpractice, namely in the form of medical disputes. The dispute is filed with a criminal or civil suit which leads to the process of examining the case in court. In the case of examination, the evidence is required under legal provisions. One of the pieces of evidence is medical records as documentary evidence. The provision that medical records can be used as evidence is Permenkes No. 269 / MENKES / PER / III / 2008 concerning Medical Records. However, the medical record evidence does not necessarily have the power of proof in proving whether the nurse is wrong or not. In criminal law, to prove it adheres to the principle of proof of law negatively, which seeks material truth, not formal truth as medical record evidence so that the position of medical record evidence needs to be equipped with other evidence, and it must be with the conviction of a judge. Whereas civil law it is looking for formal truth, meaning that only sufficient evidence requires written evidence. Medical records can be used as evidence for both patients and doctors, nurses, and health service providers at court case examinations, because medical records contain who, when, how, the medical action took place. Medical records as a means of legal protection at least provide legal assurance and certainty to uphold law and justice. This study aims to examine juridically medical records as a means of legal protection for nurses. The approach used in this research is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach.

Since the decision of the Constitutional Court Number: 93 / PUU-X / 2012, which states that sharia economic disputes resolution is the absolute authority of the Religious Courts. Of course, this authority requires law as a tool in resolving sharia economic disputes in both formal and material law. The reality is that the use of procedural law in sharia economic dispute resolution applies civil procedural law as it employs general courts. This raises problems for Religious Court Judges. As a Muslim, it would be against his conscience. Resolving sharia disputes, but must use the procedural law inherited from the Dutch colonialists which are contradictory to Islamic law. For this reason, as a solution to these problems, peace is the best choice for resolving sharia economic disputes as long as there is no Islamic judicial procedure law to be applied in the Indonesian Religious Court. This solution for this advantage answers doubts about the use of civil procedural law. Reconciliation is very good and recommended, as ordered by the religion of Islam. Even though there are differences between civil procedural law in general courts and Islamic judicial procedural law, there is no difference in the context of good peace, both of them prioritize the settlement of a dispute by well-disposed means which is the best solution to be accepted by all parties without hostility.