Genes for cytochrome P4501A1 (CYP1A1) and glutathione S-transferase class mu (GSTM1) have been shown to be polymorphic, and have been implicated in tobacco-related carcinogenesis. In the present study, the role of the combined genotypes CYP1A1 and GSTM1 as a possible modulator of smoking related lung cancers was studied in relation to the tobacco smoke exposure level in 118 Japanese patients aged < 70 with squamous or small cell carcinomas of the lung. Among male smoking patients, the overall proportion of the GSTM1 null genotype (GSTM1[-]) was slightly higher than among healthy male smoker controls (56.7% versus 48.1%, P = 0.17). Little difference was observed between smoker patients and corresponding controls in overall frequencies of m2 mutant allele homozygotes (CYP1A1[m2/m2]) (16-18%) and Val encoding allele homozygotes (5-6%). However, when subjects were categorized by both CYP1A1 genotype (MspI polymorphism) and GSTM1 genotype, GSTM1(-) became markedly more expressed in patients with CYP1A1(m2/m2) when compared to the corresponding smoker controls (81.3% versus 39.4%, P < 0.01). When odds ratios were estimated using nonsmoking patients and healthy controls as a reference, the relative risk for developing lung cancer was found to increase in a cigarette dose-dependent manner across all combinations of genotypes. Furthermore, a 7- to 8-fold variation in risk was found among the various combinations; 3.2 in individuals with combined GSTM1(+) and CYP1A1(m2/m2) and 21.9 in those with combined GSTM1(-) and CYP1A1(m2/m2) genotype when the smoking index (sigma cigarettes smoked per day x years of smoking) was set at > or = 800. The results suggest that individuals having CYP1A1(m2/m2) are relatively resistant to tobacco-related lung cancers when combined with GSTM1(+), but are highly susceptible when combined with GSTM1(-). Combined CYP1A1 and GSTM1 genotype is thus a potential predictor of genetic susceptibility to smoking-related lung cancers in populations where CYP1A1 m2 or Val alleles are common.
Recently, homozygous gene deletion of GSTM1, one of the Mu class glutathione S-transferase isozymes, was found to occur in approximately half of the population of various ethnic origins and has been implicated in tobacco-related carcinogenesis. In the present study we evaluated the risk of GSTM1 null genotype for lung cancer in relation to the extent of tobacco smoke exposure in 178 lung cancer patients (157 males, 21 females) and 201 healthy controls (140 males, 61 females), who were all Japanese and current smokers aged < or = 69 at the time of diagnosis. GSTM1 genotype was determined by polymerase chain reaction. We found GSTM1 gene to be lacking in 45.3% of the control population and demonstrated that the null genotype was aggregated a lot more in the squamous and small cell carcinoma groups (63-64%) than the control group but slightly more in the adenocarcinoma group (54.3%). Furthermore, when male patients and controls were analysed in relation to the degrees (< 800, 800-1200 and > or = 1200) of smoking index (sigma (cigarettes smoked per day) x (years of smoking)], the proportion of GSTM1 null genotype was found to increase progressively in the squamous and small cell carcinoma groups from 42-50% (odds ratio 0.8-1.3) in the patients with smoking index < 800 to 72-75% (odds ratio 3.1-3.7) in the patients with smoking index > or = 1200, while it was unrelated in the adenocarcinoma (50-55%, odds ratio 1.2-1.5) and in the control groups (42-48%). These results support the hypothesis that the GSTM1 null genotype is one of the genetic traits for smoking-related lung cancers, the risk of which, however, appears to be dependent on the extent of tobacco smoke exposure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.