Senescence and quiescence are frequently used as interchangeable terms in the literature unwittingly. Despite the fact that common molecules play role in decision of cell cycle arrest, senescent and quiescent cells have some distinctive phenotypes at both molecular and morphological levels. Thus, in this review we summarized the features of senescence and quiescence with respect to visual characteristics and prominent key molecules. A PubMed research was conducted for the key words; "senescence", "quiescence" and "cell cycle arrest". The results which are related to cell cycle control were selected. The selection criteria of the target articles used for this review included also key cell cycle molecules such as p53, pRB, p21, p16, mTOR, p27, etc. The results were not evaluated statistically. The mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) has been claimed to be key molecule in switching on/off senescence/quiescence. Specifically, although maximal p53 activation blocks mTOR and causes quiescence, partial p53 activation sustains mTOR activity and causes senescence subsequently. In broader perspective, quiescence occurs due to lack of nutrition and growth factors whereas senescence takes place due to aging and serious DNA damages. Contrary to quiescence, senescence is a degenerative process ensuing a certain cell death. We highlighted several differences between senescence and quiescence and their key molecules in this review. Whereas quiescence (cell cycle arrest) is only one half of the senescence, the other half is growth stimulation which causes actual senescence phenotype.

No abstract

Aim Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common joint diseases causing physical disability in the aged population. OA pathogenesis is not fully known and yet there are no effective therapeutic options against OA. Upper Zone of Growth Plate and Cartilage Matrix Associated (UCMA) is a member of vitamin K‐dependent protein family, and is involved in inflammation, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and OA. In the present study, our aim was to detect serum and synovial fluid (SF) levels of UCMA and to analyze their correlation with radiographic findings and symptomatic severity in OA patients as well as the correlation between oxidative stress levels and SF UCMA levels. Methods Forty OA patients with cartilage degeneration and 20 patients with other knee joint disorders (non‐OA control) were included in the present study. We used the Kellgren‐Lawrence (KL) classification and Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores to assess radiographic grading and symptomatic severity of OA, respectively. UCMA levels were measured in SF and serum. And also oxidative stress markers were analyzed in SF. Results SF UCMA levels of OA patients were higher compared to those of the non‐OA control group and were positively correlated with radiographic finding and symptomatic severity of OA. However, there was no significant correlation between oxidative markers of SF and the KL grade, WOMAC scores, and SF UCMA levels in OA patients. Conclusion There is a close connection between UCMA SF levels and symptomatic and radiographic severities of knee OA. Therefore, UCMA can be a promising biomarker in the diagnosis and/or prognosis of OA disease.

No abstract