Purpose: Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have shown the potential for non-invasive diagnosis of various types of malignancies at an early stage. The aim of the study was to explore the feasibility of a combination of 8 serum miRNAs related to non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the corresponding serum exosomal miRNAs in early diagnosis for the patients with NSCLC. Methods: We measured 8 serum miRNAs and the corresponding serum exosomal miRNAs including miR-21-5p, miR-126-3p, miR-141-3p, miR-146a-5p, miR-155-5p, miR-222-3p, miR-223-3p, and miR-486-5p in 48 patients with early NSCLC at stages I/II, 32 patients with lung benign lesion (LBL), and 48 healthy control (HC) by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Results: The expression levels of 4 serum miRNAs including miR-21-5p, miR-141-3p, miR-222-3p, and miR-486-5p, and 2 serum exosomal miRNAs including miR-146a-5p and miR-486-5p in the early NSCLC group were significantly different from that in the LBL group and the HC group (P < 0.01). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) of the 4 serum miRNAs and 2 serum exosomal miRNAs in the early NSCLC group were ≥0.697, of which serum exosomal miR-146a-5p and miR-486-5p were 0.813 and 0.886, respectively, and higher than that of the 4 serum miRNAs. Additionally, a combination of 4 serum miRNAs with 2 serum exosomal miRNAs improved the AUC to 0.960 for the patients with NSCLC at early stages, with a sensitivity of 85.42% and a specificity of 92.50%. Conclusion: This study suggests that serum exosomal miRNAs other than serum miRNAs might be preferable biomarkers for the patients with NSCLC at early stages, and a combination of serum miRNAs with serum exosomal miRNAs contributes to the further improvement of early diagnosis for NSCLC.
The aim of our study was to identify the diagnostic ability of free fatty acids (FFAs) in younger colorectal cancer (CRC) patients by comparing carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). Methods: Patients screened for CRC at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital from January 2011 to December 2014 were recruited. Patients pathologically diagnosed with CRC or colorectal adenoma (CA) and healthy control participants were included. The enzyme endpoint method was applied to measure FFA levels. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to further evaluate the diagnostic ability of FFAs. Results: FFA levels in late-stage patients (tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) stages III-IV) were higher than those in early-stage patients (TNM stages I-II) (P=0.02). The FFA levels in CRC patients were higher than those in controls of all ages, those younger than 50 years, males and females (P<0.001), and this difference was larger for patients younger than 50 years and females than for the all ages group. There was no significant difference in the FFA level between CA patients and healthy participants (P=0.53). The area under the curve (AUC) values of FFA, CEA, CA19-9, FFA+CEA, FFA+CA19-9 and FFA+CEA+CA19-9 distinguished CRC patients from controls at all ages, with values of 0.604, 0.731, 0.640, 0.754, 0.678 and 0.758, respectively; however, in the younger CRC patients (age≤50), the AUC values were 0.701, 0.735, 0.669, 0.798, 0.749, and 0.801. The AUC in female patients younger than 50 years was larger than that in males (0.769 vs 0.660), and this value was greater than the value for CEA in males (0.739) and females (0.729).
Conclusion:The FFA level not only can complement the predictive ability of the CEA and CA19-9 levels but also has a superior predictive ability in female and younger patients with CRC. FFA levels may have a potential role in triage screening of early CRC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.